Wade was supposed to fix the D!!!

eduncan22

Benched
Messages
2,384
Reaction score
0
We are 6 games into the 2007 season, and our pass defense is statistically worse than last year.

2007 24th 232 YPG 10 INT 15 Sacks
2006 24th 219 YPG 18 INT 34 Sacks

Last year's D actually played better.


Maybe it wasn't Zimmer's fault.
 

Hypnotoad

Active Member
Messages
4,649
Reaction score
0
Is that through 6 games or is that through the entire season. Statistically, large numbers should decrease when the sample size increases. For example New Englands huge game against us wont skew our stats.

Also, you can't expect a coach to fix something 6 games into it. If they do, it probably isn't a long term answer: see saints.

2007 24th 232 YPG 10 INT 15 Sacks
2007 1.667 INT per game
2007 2.5 sacks per game

2006 24th 219 YPG 18 INT 34 Sacks
2006 1.125 INT per game
2006 2.125 Sacks per game
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
We are 5-1

Please post defensive turnovers and points scored by defense.

We also lost starting NT, CB and OLB. It's not perfect but we are forcing turnovers and stopping run all in all.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
eduncan22;1719307 said:
We are 6 games into the 2007 season, and our pass defense is statistically worse than last year.

2007 24th 232 YPG 10 INT 15 Sacks
2006 24th 219 YPG 18 INT 34 Sacks

Last year's D actually played better.


Maybe it wasn't Zimmer's fault.
Last year when week 7 rolled around we were 3-2 (bye week 3).

This year we are 5-1.

Worse than last year? Not when the bottom line is better. The only stat I care about is wins and losses. Sacks are up. Takeaways are up.

Yet you're still whining? Where do you live? I want to invest in diapers, pacifiers, and Kleenex in that zip code.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Hostile;1719332 said:
Last year when week 7 rolled around we were 3-2 (bye week 3).

This year we are 5-1.

Worse than last year? Not when the bottom line is better. The only stat I care about is wins and losses. Sacks are up. Takeaways are up.

Yet you're still whining? Where do you live? I want to invest in diapers, pacifiers, and Kleenex in that zip code.

I have always wondered what color the sky is where he lives. It sure as hell isn't blue. :laugh2:
 

Mansta54

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,945
Reaction score
482
Hostile;1719332 said:
Last year when week 7 rolled around we were 3-2 (bye week 3).

This year we are 5-1.

Worse than last year? Not when the bottom line is better. The only stat I care about is wins and losses. Sacks are up. Takeaways are up.

Yet you're still whining? Where do you live? I want to invest in diapers, pacifiers, and Kleenex in that zip code.
:hammer:
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Hostile;1719332 said:
Yet you're still whining? Where do you live? I want to invest in diapers, pacifiers, and Kleenex in that zip code.

Good bet it's within the 202, 301, or 703 area code vicinity.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
tomson75;1719342 said:
Good bet it's within the 202, 301, or 703 area code vicinity.
No matter where it is, I wouldn't call him to discuss football. It would be a colossal waste of time. He doesn't get it.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
eduncan22;1719307 said:
We are 6 games into the 2007 season, and our pass defense is statistically worse than last year.

2007 24th 232 YPG 10 INT 15 Sacks
2006 24th 219 YPG 18 INT 34 Sacks

Last year's D actually played better.


Maybe it wasn't Zimmer's fault.


Got a link for those figures?
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
DCfaninDC;1719356 said:
And what is wrong with Cowboys fans in that area??:D

Nothing. I'm from that area. I think you missed my suggestion here.
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
ELDudearino;1719354 said:
Got a link for those figures?

While he's looking for those figures again, I wonder if he'll come across the stats that the cowboys have been thrown at more than every team in the NFL sans cleveland...or that we're 13th in opposing QB's completion percentage...or that we're 10th in YPC allowed and opposing QB rating...or that all of these stats are after we've played what many experts are calling the most proficient passing attack in the history of the NFL. I wonder.
 

Nors

Benched
Messages
22,015
Reaction score
1
eduncan22;1719307 said:
We are 6 games into the 2007 season, and our pass defense is statistically worse than last year.

2007 24th 232 YPG 10 INT 15 Sacks
2006 24th 219 YPG 18 INT 34 Sacks

Last year's D actually played better.


Maybe it wasn't Zimmer's fault.

You missed a few others:

Record 5-1
Team Offense #2 in NFL
Team Defense #11 in NFL
Sacks - #9 in NFL
Interceptions - #1 in NFL


10 turnovers caused in 6 games wins football games. Sacks and team pressure cause QB's to make mistakes.

Teams can't run on us and our 2 starting CB's are injured/out. Starting NT gone, Ellis just back.

Mr Fix it gets a passing grade from me so far all in all.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,105
Reaction score
11,445
Hmm, you'd almost think Henry were hurt or something and someone had to find something else to ***** about.

Naw, that couldn't be it.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Nors;1719371 said:
You missed a few others:

Record 5-1
Team Offense #2 in NFL
Team Defense #11 in NFL
Sacks - #9 in NFL
Interceptions - #1 in NFL


10 turnovers caused in 6 games wins football games. Sacks and team pressure cause QB's to make mistakes.

Teams can't run on us and our 2 starting CB's are injured/out. Starting NT gone, Ellis just back.

Mr Fix it gets a passing grade from me so far all in all.
eduncan22 >>> :spanking: <<< Nors
 

PhillyCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
4,968
eduncan22;1719307 said:
We are 6 games into the 2007 season, and our pass defense is statistically worse than last year.

2007 24th 232 YPG 10 INT 15 Sacks
2006 24th 219 YPG 18 INT 34 Sacks

Last year's D actually played better.

O.K., I have never responded to any of your post and I am not into calling people names
18 int's and 34 sacks is for the total year. So if you take this years numbers through the whole year, what do you have?

26 int's and 40 sacks!
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
For the love of me, I just wish we had our starting D together as a whole for a change. This includes Henry and Newman as starting corners with Tank. This is the day I'm waiting for.
 
Top