Chocolate Lab
Run-loving Dino
- Messages
- 37,242
- Reaction score
- 11,761
theebs;1530954 said:I think cl was referring to the Commanders, seeing that is what this thread is about.
Yes, he was.
theebs;1530954 said:I think cl was referring to the Commanders, seeing that is what this thread is about.
theebs;1530954 said:I think cl was referring to the Commanders, seeing that is what this thread is about.
theogt;1530472 said:Their QB is below average. Their offensive line is horrible. Their receiving corps is one guy. Their defensive line is horrible. Their linebacking corps is mediocre. Their corners pretty much suck. Their "star" safety just came off one of the worst years of all time for a defensive back and the other safety is a rookie (who I always considered overrated, or at least not worthy of a top 10 pick).
How can you really say this is a very good roster?
Says who?skinsfunguy;1530981 said:Um...we have had a top 5 offensive line the last two years.
Chocolate Lab;1530985 said:Says who?
Art?
skinsfunguy;1530981 said:Um...we have had a top 5 offensive line the last two years.
The only player we lost is Dockery who isn't that great anyway
skinsfunguy;1530981 said:Um...we have had a top 5 offensive line the last two years. The only player we lost is Dockery who isn't that great anyway. Get your facts straight.
Maybe a top 5 OL. The Seahags are dropping, Kansas City is a shell of itself...after teams like Indy, New England, and Denver, who else are you putting up there? I guess New York, maybe.jobberone;1531105 said:Well they are not top five in anything right now except for worse defense and least draft picks.
Methinks the latter fans have had less Koolaid.
Anything seems to go in the NFL these days. But I'd bet on Washington finishing last in the NFC and getting to .500 at the best.
They've done nothing on the DL where they were among the worst in the league at getting pressure. Not a lot at LB with poor tackling reigned. CB isn't anything to brag about. They did get Landry. I like their QB, RBs, TE but that's not going to get them to the playoffs. JMO.
I like our chances much better.
I believe their roster has the talent to get them to the playoffs. I think their problem is the assistant coaching, and their depth is atrocious. RB seems to be the only position where they have solid depth.superpunk;1531106 said:Maybe a top 5 OL. The Seahags are dropping, Kansas City is a shell of itself...after teams like Indy, New England, and Denver, who else are you putting up there? I guess New York, maybe.
They're just not drinking as much of that "this is the same team that was two plays away from the NFCCG two years ago". Because maybe they realize, it is also the same team that went 6-10 last year and attempted to set records for futility in rushing the passer.
I see a scenario of perfect health, and perfecet defensive execution wherein they challenge for a WC spot. I don't think they have enough talent to handle any adversity.
jobberone;1531057 said:What do you mean by 'top five' OL? In other words top five by what criteria?
skinsfunguy;1531137 said:Well, here is one source. http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Article.php?Page=1024&Category=2
Yeagermeister;1531315 said:That is your source? :laugh2:
theogt;1530482 said:Run blocking is pretty good. Pass blocking not so much. Their linebackers are pretty average.
Unless Campbell goes through significant improvements, I don't see them doing anything. They didn't address their biggest problems on defense. And it's not like Campbell is going to go from sucking to above average this quickly, though I do think he'll improve.