WaPo: Commanders Dumbing Down Their Defense

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
For the Commanders, It's Simple

Defensive Approach Has Been Streamlined to Accentuate Key Players' Strengths

By Jason La Canfora
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, June 16, 2007; Page E01


In three years under Gregg Williams, the Washington Commanders' defense was characterized by its numerous personnel packages and intricate schemes. Williams required his players to master responses to the opposing offense's every move, even as they carried out a series of pre-snap movements to conceal where the defensive pressure would be coming from.

In 2004 and 2005, the Commanders' defenders and their coach were completely in sync and became one of the fiercest units in the NFL. But as the unit's collapse last year revealed, the precision and choreography demanded by Williams could be undermined by a single misstep by one player.

As the team began a three-day minicamp at Commanders Park yesterday, there was a new buzzword for the defense: simplicity.

Williams's system has been pared down for 2007, players say, still emphasizing the principles of speed, aggressiveness and discipline but relying more on individual talent than collective obedience. There are fewer schemes for players to memorize and more alignments are designed to accentuate key players' strengths. There will be less of a burden on Williams and his staff to out-scheme the opposing offense every week.

"We've definitely simplified things," said linebacker Marcus Washington, one of the players who could benefit most from the changes. "And I think that was Gregg looking at us last year, all of us in it together, and nobody likes to be at the bottom, especially when we're used to being at the top.

"That was Gregg being the sharp mental guy he is, and being smart about it, saying, 'I'm just going to let these guys play. We have some talent here, and when I put them in the right position, I'm going to let them play and sit back.' And that's what we're going to do."

Williams, who declined to comment for this story, told players this offseason that he plans to get his best players to the point of attack as much as possible and give them more freedom, they said. Williams is using more traditional five- and six-defensive back formations in passing downs. The addition of linebacker London Fletcher and cornerbacks Fred Smoot and David Macklin through free agency, and the selection of safety LaRon Landry with the sixth overall pick in the draft in April is expected to provide a major boost as well.

"You've got to have the right balance between players and scheme, and you've got to have the right players to make the scheme work," lineman Renaldo Wynn said. "We saw examples of that last year -- without mentioning any names -- when we brought in different guys and they just didn't fit our scheme. If you've got the players and the scheme, it can be successful as you saw our first two years. Now, with Gregg simplifying it makes it even better, and guys can be even more aggressive and not have to think as much."

The area that bore the brunt of criticism last year -- the defensive line -- was surprisingly the position impacted the least through offseason player acquisitions. Despite a porous interior against the run and an inept pass rush, the Commanders made no significant changes to the roster at tackle or end.

During season-ending meetings with the linemen, the coaches expressed confidence in them, players said, and told them that they would have more chances to get after the quarterback this season.

Williams gave the linemen less pass-rushing support from safeties and corners than usual in 2006 -- the lack of talent at those positions was a huge factor in that decision -- and opposing quarterbacks enjoyed too much time to pass the ball. With Fletcher, a stalwart on Williams's defense when both were with the Buffalo Bills, anchoring the interior as middle linebacker now, the Commanders believe they will be more stout against the run. Also, Williams is more willing to overload the line of scrimmage to stop the run, players said. Concerns about the woeful secondary prevented that last year.

Starting end Phillip Daniels anticipates playing inside much more this season to help against the run. "That gives Gregg the opportunity to put more speed on the field" outside, he said. Tackle Cornelius Griffin, by far the Commanders' most accomplished lineman, is healthy after playing last year with a surgically repaired shoulder and significant knee injury.

Griffin is being used as what in football parlance is called a three-technique, players said, giving him more opportunities to rush the passer. A three-technique player lines up opposite the outside shoulder of the offensive guard and is charged with disrupting the offensive pocket by attacking the line and getting into the backfield. Tommie Harris played that role for the NFC champion Chicago Bears last season, players said. The Commanders defense will adopt many of the Bears' tactics this year.

"It's a little more aggressive. There's a little more freedom," Griffin said.

Williams also has been calling more all-out blitzes and four-man rushes, players said. "Now I know I can feed off a guy like Griffin, because I know now he's going to be trying to penetrate that gap," said defensive end Andre Carter, who struggled in his first season in Washington. "So that'll give me a two-way go and we'll both come out smoking. This year they really want to rely on our talent on the front four itself."

Marcus Washington, the Commanders' best linebacker since joining the team in 2006, will have an expanded role. He's preparing to play as a rush end, with his hand down, on many passing downs and is expected to be used much less in pass coverage.

"Putting my hand on the ground, I hadn't done it in awhile," Washington said. "But [defensive line] coach Greg Blache and the rest of the defensive line, they've been helping me through it and it's something I'm excited to do."

The Commanders expect to have two new starting linebackers, Fletcher and Rocky McIntosh, who the team says has had a superior offseason and finally has a firm grip on the defense after a difficult rookie season. McIntosh, with good speed, will be used to cover tight ends and running backs downfield, players said. Fletcher also excels at pass coverage, which will allow the Commanders to toggle between him and McIntosh, leaving offenses wondering which linebacker will be dropping back on passing plays.

The biggest change for the defense will be in the defensive backfield, where coaches are hoping for a dramatic improvement.

Lacking confidence in the unit last season, Williams was not as aggressive rushing the quarterback, players and coaches said, and relied on what's known as a cover-2 zone defense -- with the two safeties playing deep and the cornerbacks conceding yardage to receivers at the line of scrimmage. The Commanders expect to use significantly more man-to-man coverage in 2007 -- with their corners no longer stationed five yards back but jamming receivers at the line. The cover-2 has been relegated to only some passing situations.

"With the changes we made, teams are going to look at the film of us from last year and try to pick up things, and it's totally different now," said cornerback Carlos Rogers, whose play regressed last year after a solid rookie season. "We're doing a lot of pressing, a lot of things where we can get in on that receiver and Gregg's making things a lot simpler for us. I really like what we're doing, but at the same time we've got to step up, because they could tear our corners up, too, always being out there by yourself."

The Commanders also are using what is called a cover-1 alignment, with safety Sean Taylor the lone man back, playing the football equivalent of center field. The coaches want to find a way to get Taylor, a natural ballhawk who has just three interceptions the last two years, to the ball more often. Landry, the No. 1 draft pick, has the size and tenacity to play close to the line of scrimmage to rush quarterbacks and help on run defense, similar to how Chicago uses safety Mike Brown.

The Commanders are using the designation of free safety for Taylor and strong safety for Landry, and the team feels that their athletic ability will allow them to cover as much ground as any safety duo in the league. Taylor's size makes him suited to playing in close to the line as well, which can keep opponents guessing.

"I would like to put Sean Taylor in a position to go and get the ball," Williams said during rookie camp. "I think LaRon is going to help us do that."
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
theogt;1530376 said:
The Commanders also are using what is called a cover-1 alignment, with safety Sean Taylor the lone man back, playing the football equivalent of center field. The coaches want to find a way to get Taylor, a natural ballhawk who has just three interceptions the last two years, to the ball more often.


:lmao2:

Man, I can't wait to go to Fedex this year.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
tomson75;1530384 said:
:lmao2:

Man, I can't wait to go to Fedex this year.
The Giants and Commanders look to be just a complete mess next year. Unfortunately, I think the Eagles will be pretty strong.
 

flashback

Real Man of Genius
Messages
723
Reaction score
51
"There are fewer schemes for players to memorize and more alignments are designed to accentuate key players' strengths."

Actually, the schemes were necessary to disguise the weaknesses and general lack of talent on the defensive side of the ball. I don't think that's changed much. Getting Marshall, Holdman and whoever played the other safety spot off the field is a pretty good start, but they'll need to upgrade about 5 more positions before you can start talking about "accentuat(ing) key players' strengths".

I guess its really the only move they can make, though. It sure looks like the Cowboys figured Williams' defense out in 2006, and I guess a lot of other teams around the league did, too.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
So, they're going to dumb down a defense that is completely reliant on deception and complication to get to the QB?

They may continue to redefine futility when it comes to getting to the pass rusher this year. They shouldn't be dumbing things down at this point of Williams' tenure. It's not like they added alot of new players or are changing a scheme.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
theogt;1530394 said:
The Giants and Commanders look to be just a complete mess next year. Unfortunately, I think the Eagles will be pretty strong.


I think that is a very good Commanders team. I hate their guts, but I think that is a very good roster and if they get some momentum early they will be as good as they were in 05 or better because they now have more talent.

Its all going to come down to campbell though. IF he struggles and they can only score 13 or 17 points a game they will struggle.

I think all 4 nfc east teams this season are going to be very strong. The giants because of the loss of barber and coughlins seemingly impending doom seem as the only team I would think could have the wheels come off this year. I dont really see that happening right now though.

This years nfc east is going to be what many thought last year would be, I believe.

the winner of this division I think will go deep into the playoffs or the superbowl. I think the east has past the south as the best division and the toughest.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
The Commanders also are using what is called a cover-1 alignment, with safety Sean Taylor the lone man back, playing the football equivalent of center field.

Terry Glenn, your thoughts?

redbig.jpg


95925_240X277.jpg


Very interesting...
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
HeavyHitta31;1530421 said:
Terry Glenn, your thoughts?

redbig.jpg


95925_240X277.jpg


Very interesting...

LOL

I am currently working on the sean taylor segment of my terry glenn highlight video! Lot of fun stuff.
 

JackMagist

The Great Communicator
Messages
5,726
Reaction score
0
superpunk;1530410 said:
So, they're going to dumb down a defense that is completely reliant on deception and complication to get to the QB?

They may continue to redefine futility when it comes to getting to the pass rusher this year. They shouldn't be dumbing things down at this point of Williams' tenure. It's not like they added alot of new players or are changing a scheme.
No...It's like Williams just figured out that he had a bunch of stupid players. That works for me.
 

Sabu1

Member
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
I think the Commanders will be better this year. They should be in the 8-8, 9-7 area. No threat to win to NFC or anything. The Giants are the team that will take a tumble this year.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
theebs;1530413 said:
I think that is a very good Commanders team. I hate their guts, but I think that is a very good roster and if they get some momentum early they will be as good as they were in 05 or better because they now have more talent.

Its all going to come down to campbell though. IF he struggles and they can only score 13 or 17 points a game they will struggle.

I think all 4 nfc east teams this season are going to be very strong. The giants because of the loss of barber and coughlins seemingly impending doom seem as the only team I would think could have the wheels come off this year. I dont really see that happening right now though.

This years nfc east is going to be what many thought last year would be, I believe.

the winner of this division I think will go deep into the playoffs or the superbowl. I think the east has past the south as the best division and the toughest.
Their QB is below average. Their offensive line is horrible. Their receiving corps is one guy. Their defensive line is horrible. Their linebacking corps is mediocre. Their corners pretty much suck. Their "star" safety just came off one of the worst years of all time for a defensive back and the other safety is a rookie (who I always considered overrated, or at least not worthy of a top 10 pick).

How can you really say this is a very good roster?
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
theogt;1530472 said:
Their QB is below average. Their offensive line is horrible. Their receiving corps is one guy. Their defensive line is horrible. Their linebacking corps is mediocre. Their corners pretty much suck. Their "star" safety just came off one of the worst years of all time for a defensive back and the other safety is a rookie (who I always considered overrated, or at least not worthy of a top 10 pick).

How can you really say this is a very good roster?

That's a pretty devastating, unconvincing assessment.

Campbell might be at least average in year two. Their offensive line is fantastic. The rest...meh.

I do like the notion that they're just idiots so Williams realized he had to change.

But, then again - they're not the only defense in the east that's preaching change after a monumental collapse through lack of execution last year. :(
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
superpunk;1530474 said:
That's a pretty devastating, unconvincing assessment.

Campbell might be at least average in year two. Their offensive line is fantastic. The rest...meh.

I do like the notion that they're just idiots so Williams realized he had to change.

But, then again - they're not the only defense in the east that's preaching change after a monumental collapse through lack of execution last year. :(
LOL. Yeah, he might not suck. Maybe. That's convincing.

Their offensive line doesn't suck but it's not fantastic. They couldn't pick up a blitz to save their lives in '06. I remember they had to "dumb down" their line scheme as well then.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
superpunk;1530474 said:
That's a pretty devastating, unconvincing assessment.

Campbell might be at least average in year two. Their offensive line is fantastic. The rest...meh.

I do like the notion that they're just idiots so Williams realized he had to change.

But, then again - they're not the only defense in the east that's preaching change after a monumental collapse through lack of execution last year. :(

you could say the same thing about our Dallas players, they're moving to a simpler scheme too
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
theogt;1530477 said:
LOL. Yeah, he might not suck. Maybe. That's convincing.

Their offensive line doesn't suck but it's not fantastic. They couldn't pick up a blitz to save their lives in '06. I remember they had to "dumb down" their line scheme as well then.

I was just thinking of the run blocking. They do have some pretty nice LBs, too - fantastic TE, nice set of RBs, they really do have some talent. Just not enough, probably. But I think they'll improve.

Bob Sacamano;1530479 said:
you could say the same thing about our Dallas players, they're moving to a simpler scheme too

Guess you didn't quite make it to the end of my post. :(

superpunk;1530474 said:
But, then again - they're not the only defense in the east that's preaching change after a monumental collapse through lack of execution last year. :(
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
superpunk;1530480 said:
Guess you didn't quite make it to the end of my post. :(

meh, I almost fell asleep reading through it, it was all over the place

but so is my head, late night ;)
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
superpunk;1530480 said:
I was just thinking of the run blocking. They do have some pretty nice LBs, too - fantastic TE, nice set of RBs, they really do have some talent. Just not enough, probably. But I think they'll improve.
Run blocking is pretty good. Pass blocking not so much. Their linebackers are pretty average. They had problems in the run game last year. It's part of the reason Taylor had to play closer to the line and racked up so many tackles. They do have a pretty good TE/H-back and a nice set of RBs. Oh, and I did mention their lone WR that's pretty good. But that's hardly enough to think they're a "very good Commanders team."

Unless Campbell goes through significant improvements, I don't see them doing anything. They didn't address their biggest problems on defense. And it's not like Campbell is going to go from sucking to above average this quickly, though I do think he'll improve.

Bob Sacamano;1530479 said:
you could say the same thing about our Dallas players, they're moving to a simpler scheme too
What? We're moving to a simpler scheme? Since when? By all accounts we're moving to a much more complex scheme.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
theogt;1530482 said:
What? We're moving to a simpler scheme? Since when? By all accounts we're moving to a much more complex scheme.

not if you listen to Wade Phillips describe his D as being simple for the players to learn
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Bob Sacamano;1530491 said:
not if you listen to Wade Phillips describe his D as being simple for the players to learn
It may be simple to learn, but this defense isn't getting more simple.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,937
Reaction score
113,001
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Sabu1;1530442 said:
I think the Commanders will be better this year. They should be in the 8-8, 9-7 area. No threat to win to NFC or anything. The Giants are the team that will take a tumble this year.
JMO, but the Redstinks will be lucky to pull off a 8-8 record this year. That is a 3 game improvement over last year not including the game they stole from us.
 
Top