Ware had 4 sacks, not 3

Q_the_man;2354985 said:
Exactly, I can see Ware now I got 4 sacks, great game Ware what was the score oh we lost to the Rams by 20, and ur happy with those 4 sacks, yep....

Glad that Ware is performing but we lost and those sack mean nothing, BTW they scored on 2 of the drive he got a sack.

Plurals dude. Plurals.

...and there are plenty of other threads lamenting the loss and declaring this team the worst team since '97. This particular thread isn't about that, and nor does it have to be to appease your sensitivities.
 
TheCount;2354942 said:
Because it seemed like a ridiculous thing to be arguing, 3 vs 4 sacks, after the lowest point we've had in a long time as a team.

:lmao: :laugh2: :laugh1: :lmao: :lmao:

at your avatar, Burnett is made of glass :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh1: :laugh1:
 
Q_the_man;2354985 said:
Exactly, I can see Ware now I got 4 sacks, great game Ware what was the score oh we lost to the Rams by 20, and ur happy with those 4 sacks, yep....

Glad that Ware is performing but we lost and those sack mean nothing, BTW they scored on 2 of the drive he got a sack.

So if you don't care, why the hell did you post in this thread?



I guess it's not possible to be happy for Ware and want him to get his due credit, and also be upset about the loss at the same time.
 
Hoofbite;2354958 said:
Well if this season is going in the crapper and all we have to look forward to is individual accomplishments, I hope he does get that 4th sack.

I agree.
 
How does Ware get 4.5 sacks and a FF and the D still gives up 34?


What else does Ware have to do on this team, cover the opposing team's best WR man 2 man?, play MLB, make the in-game adjustments??


Give Ware everything he is due, all others on the Dallas D need to give Jerry back some money or just cut themselves now if unable to improve.
 
The only way you get the sack to Ware is if they think Bulger finished going down because he was aware of Ware's presence. Basically, the question is if Ware isn't there, does Bulger stay on his feet?
 
Rack;2354850 said:
They gave James credit for a sack where Bulger had actually made him look like the sorry LB he is, then Ware came and cleaned up. NO way in hell did James get that sack. I hope the NFL reviews it and sets things straight.

You're wrong...it was obvious on the replay...even the announcers called it.

James got an arm on him and Bulger spun out but went down on his knee...the whistle blew, and Ware cleaned it up, but no sack.

He had 3. I'm shocked they gave him a sack on the first one because it looked like he was supposed to hand the ball to Jackson...I thought it was a running play, and he got tackled for a one yard loss, but maybe it was play-action.
 
BAT;2355519 said:
How does Ware get 4.5 sacks and a FF and the D still gives up 34?


What else does Ware have to do on this team, cover the opposing team's best WR man 2 man?, play MLB, make the in-game adjustments??


Give Ware everything he is due, all others on the Dallas D need to give Jerry back some money or just cut themselves now if unable to improve.

Ware and Ratliff are the ONLY players we have on defense.

I think Scandrick could turn into something eventually.

Everyone else on that side of the ball can go jump off a cliff for all I care. They all suck.

WHat really gets me is that they consider Brady James their leader. OMG, if he's the leader then that explains it all. He's an average player (AT BEST) and he's satisfied with substandard play from his teammates as long as they win.


I've never seen him get in anybody's face for screwing up, which is something the leader is supposed to do. You see Ray Lewis do it all the time.


Keep Ware, Ratliff, Witten, Romo, Barber, and Felix Jones (and MAYBE Scandrick, Bennett, and Jenkins) and get rid of everyone else. They all stink.
 
I kind of want to keep McBriar and Folk, rack.

;)


And for the cost of trading for Roy Williams, we better keep him. And I think we should keep Austin, too.
 
wayne motley;2355719 said:
You're wrong...it was obvious on the replay...even the announcers called it.

James got an arm on him and Bulger spun out but went down on his knee...the whistle blew, and Ware cleaned it up, but no sack.

He had 3. I'm shocked they gave him a sack on the first one because it looked like he was supposed to hand the ball to Jackson...I thought it was a running play, and he got tackled for a one yard loss, but maybe it was play-action.

Even if his knee did somehow touch the ground after James "touched" him I'd still want Ware to get the credit cuz Bulger made James look like the piece of crap that he is on the play.

James can run straight ahead just fine but he can't freakin' turn. He sucks.

And it was obvious it was play action on that other play.
 
Rack;2354894 said:
I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he just juked James (James changes directions about as well as an old school bus with 6 flat tires) then Ware came in and finished him.

It was obvious to me Bulger got away from James cleanly, then Ware got him.

James hit Bulger, Bulger's knee went down.
 
James hits Bulger.

Bulger's knee hits ground.

=

James got the sack.


DUH. It wasn't even close to beings Ware's sack.
 
James didn't "Hit" Bulger. He might have accidently "Knicked" him.

Unless I"m thinking of a completely different play, the one I"m thinking of James got owned.
 
if I recall on the replay, it looked like Bulger's knee may have hit the turf b/c of James' hit, then Ware came in and finished him off.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,054
Messages
13,786,169
Members
23,771
Latest member
LandryHat
Back
Top