randy932;1372896 said:
Tell me coach. Why did the team comprised of Campo's guys and coached by Parcells have a better record than any other team Parcells coached in Dallas? Did he do it on purpose? Did he suddenly get stupid?
I never said that the talent wasn't better now, but I don't think that the term "much better" fits when there has been zero results that bear it out. If the talent was MUCH better, then common sense says that there should be at least a token amount of improvement.
BTW - regardless of your opinion, I am far from ignorant.
Says the person w/o a clue.
The team is MUCH improved. The problem is we've faced better competition this past 3 years then we did the first year. We caught a few teams w/major injuries that first year. We got bit by the injury bug in 2005.
But just go position by position and see for yourself. We're much better then in 2003.
QB: Carter or Romo
RB: Hambrick or JuJo/MBIII
WR: Gallowaste/Glenn or TO/Glenn. Also, what about the backup WRs?
TE: Witten as a rookie or Witten as a 3 time probowler and better depth?
OL: Do I even have to name these guys? We're MUCH Better on the OL now.
DL: Ekuban was still a starter for us in 2003. Nuff said.
LB: We were solid at LB in 2003, but we're better now.
CB: Newman and Mario Edwards or Newman (with 4 years Experience) and Henry?
SS: Roy then or Roy now?
FS: We're better now.
P: Better now
K: Better now
Still think you aren't ignorant? Maybe ignorant wasn't the right word to use then.