Watching All or Nothing

Watching the show just all but solidified my position on Garrett. He's not a coach, he's more of a speech specialist. And when he does try to make an xs and os point it's redundant and way too simple. I mean this guy is awful, he reminds of Jeff Fisher in every single way.

The one thing he does well is at least the team practices hard. I'll give him that.

Garrett would be a perfect assistant coach. Not the main guy.
 
I'm surprised anyone would have to watch AON to realize Garrett must be a hell of a talker to keep his job despite having virtually no schematic responsibilities and no real success.
wow, just wow.... so how many head coaches have schematic responsibilities? John Harbaugh? Marvin Lewis? Hue Jackson? Bill O'Brian? Pete carroll?

there is more this year and there is more in history of NFL..... most head coaches were coordinators before they became head coaches...there are some exceptions.

and there is a longer list of coaches having had less success......

so kool it and put it in perspective.....you are an absolute garrett hater...even if he wins the superbowl, you will give credit to somebody else and will say its despite him...guaranteed.
 
Garrett should forget coaching and follow Witten to the broadcast booth. He can be free to tell as many stories as he wants and provide minimal/basic football talk.

I will go back and watch All or Nothing with the 2015 Cardinals so that I can compare. Bruce Arians is the opposite of Garrett, even though he's not coaching anymore, I want to see how he ran the team and how his staff looked.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
474,203
Messages
14,520,954
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top