- Messages
- 33,772
- Reaction score
- 31,539
Thanks to Pittsburgh for selecting Shazier and Decastro, so we can have clear plan.
Lol
Thanks to Pittsburgh for selecting Shazier and Decastro, so we can have clear plan.
I agree with your statement that we had a plan, but the cards didn't fall like we hoped they would. Lawrence may turn out to be well worth the trade up. That remains to be seen. I hope it works out that way.
The one thing in your post that I disagree with is your suggestion that we drafted to win now, while preparing for the future. Lawrence was a "win now" pick. If we had been preparing for long term team success we would have stayed put and not moved up for Lawrence. The opportunity cost of moving up was a 3rd round pick (and presumably a potential starter) to get Lawrence, thus arguably extending the time it will take to rebuild with one less player/pick. I'm not saying that it was a bad more .... or a good move .....it is too early to know that, but let's be real, that was a "win now" move whether you agree with the decision they made or not.
When making a plan, it's incumbent that the planner have a plan A, B, C, etc. I think the Cowboys were prepared in that regard.
The good news is that we have one more year of Doug Free at RT, so missing out on Turner was not a total loss.
Wrong. The plan was to draft one of 4 guys if they were available or possibly trade down. It's crystal clear the player you referenced wasn't the only targeted player we had in our draft sights or available at the time we were on the clock. Nice try and another jab at the FO however.Apparently part of our plan was for Pittsburgh to take our target at 15 leaving us with the offensive lineman.
I love it when a plan comes together.
That's a legitimate concern, but it's also one which should be expected by the front office. Nothing should prevent the scouting staff to continue evaluating quality mid-round offensive linemen talent in upcoming drafts; and help supplement the offensive line until Smith, Frederick, or Martin begin pressing the limits of the team's salary cap. And I do mean quality mid-round offensive linemen talent. No more David Arkins.They better win now because they'll never be able to re-sign all three first round picks on the OL.
Root for Parnell and Weems
I'm glad that Shazier was snatched so the team was forced to make the smart decision and go with the OL. Giving up next years 2nd to move into the end of the 3rd still shows their incompetence (unfortunately).
Parnell has the physical ability and talent. He was supposed to challenge for the starting job last year, but injuries set him back early and he never recovered. If he doesn't beat Free out this year, I think he is done with having a chance to start. I would like to see him start this year just for the reason that Free would be there to take over if he doesn't play well. I have noticed that the coaches are all quite about him and he doesn't receive the praise that he once did.
I have been making the argument for some time now that we are still a a round of Free Agency and another draft away from contention. But perhaps your right...with a little Marinelli magic, this defense could blossom and considering the state of the NFCE, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that this team reach the playoffs. From there, it's all about who gets hot at the right time. I'm a long way from being sold on this team, but I'll at least admit your argument has merit; especially if this team could simply stay healthy.
Every team has a "plan" for the draft. And each team feels great and publicly says so even after they had to go with Plan B, version 5.0 after things changed on the fly. It is all part of the draft chess game.
All in all, we wanted to address both lines, we did that.
More interested in the results than the warm fuzzies that a "plan came together". If we picked the right players, it will be self evident.
Parnell has the physical ability and talent. He was supposed to challenge for the starting job last year, but injuries set him back early and he never recovered.
I thought Quarles and Jeffcoat were good value at UDFA but obviously Marinelli isn't in to them.
I like the job he did as a DC in Chicago but he certainly didn't put the personnel together on that defense. He coached them up.
Coached the slugs we had on the DL last year too. Just don't know if he's necessarily the best talent evaluator.
So although I do like Marinellis blessing on a player he's going to have to coach I don't think that's the end all on choosing players for this defense.
It had hints of a desperation move with a touch of panic. They were scared of going into the season without a DE and he was the last pass rusher left on their list.
Every team has a "plan" for the draft. And each team feels great and publicly says so even after they had to go with Plan B, version 5.0 after things changed on the fly. It is all part of the draft chess game.
All in all, we wanted to address both lines, we did that.
More interested in the results than the warm fuzzies that a "plan came together". If we picked the right players, it will be self evident.