kingwhicker
BCRSA
- Messages
- 3,290
- Reaction score
- 0
Hostile;1903170 said:22 and 30.
Thanks. 30 :bang2:
Hostile;1903170 said:22 and 30.
Why are you so willing to throw away a 1st rounder?elcocinero;1903175 said:How about a first rounder and Roy Williams (SS) and Jacques Reeves, for Roy Williams (WR).
:laugh2:
Anderson is a much better special teams guy and receiver than Hoyte though.theogt;1903180 said:Works for me. But I'd rather cut Anderson, than Hoyte. Hoyte was a beast in the first half and probably the single biggest reason (other than Barber himself) that Barber had 100+ yards.
Hostile;1903188 said:Why are you so willing to throw away a 1st rounder?
I repeat, they are looking for Defense, not draft picks. Someone like a Bradie James possibly. (No, I'm not saying trade them Bradie.)
Reeves is a Free Agent, so why trade him.
I won't comment on the continuous trade Roy ideas.
AMERICAS_FAN;1903122 said:Newman was not thrown at because (1) he is a pro-bwl corner, and (2) two of the other three guys in the secondary - Williams and Reeves - are that bad
AMERICAS_FAN;1903122 said:Newman was not thrown at because (1) he is a pro-bwl corner, and (2) two of the other three guys in the secondary - Williams and Reeves - are that bad, and becaue they are that bad, Hanlin, another pro-bowler, can be easily nullified.
**
Hostile;1903208 said:One correction I should make. Our pick is #30 if New England is in the Super Bowl. If by some miracle San Diego beats them #30 would be theirs and #29 would be ours.
22 Dallas (from Cleve.) 10-6 .425
23 Pittsburgh 10-6 .453
24 Tennessee 10-6 .500
25 Seattle 10-6 .414
26* New York Giants 10-6 .516
27 Jacksonville 11-5 .516
28* San Diego 11-5 .500
29 Dallas 13-3 .496
30 San Fran. (from Ind.) 13-3 .516
31* Green Bay 13-3 .469
32* New England (forfeited) 16-0 .469
elcocinero;1903149 said:I disagree with this sentiment when it comes to a 26 year old top tier receiver like Roy Williams. Nobody at the bottom of the first round will give us his skill set.
I'll double check my numbers Adam, but I think the %'s are wrong on Indy and us.AdamJT13;1903253 said:I'm pretty sure that's not correct. We have the 29th pick right now. If San Diego and the Giants play in the Super Bowl, we would pick 27th. If only one of them makes it, we pick 28th.
Indianapolis' original pick (which belongs to San Francisco) comes after ours because we had a weaker strength of schedule. And Green Bay's pick comes after both our pick and Indianapolis' original pick because they went deeper in the playoffs. New England would pick after us, too, if they didn't have it taken away.
Code:22 Dallas (from Cleve.) 10-6 .425 23 Pittsburgh 10-6 .453 24 Tennessee 10-6 .500 25 Seattle 10-6 .414 26* New York Giants 10-6 .516 27 Jacksonville 11-5 .516 28* San Diego 11-5 .500 29 Dallas 13-3 .496 30 San Fran. (from Ind.) 13-3 .516 31* Green Bay 13-3 .469 32* New England (forfeited) 16-0 .469
Adam is correct. I was missing a game for Indy.Hostile;1903267 said:I'll double check my numbers Adam, but I think the %'s are wrong on Indy and us.
If my numbers are wrong, I apologize for the false info. It is entirely possible I am wrong. I won't say for sure until I double check.
Hostile;1903192 said:Anderson is a much better special teams guy and receiver than Hoyte though.
Schmitt is a devestating blocker, good receiver, and can even play TE.
I agree. I have no loyalty to any player. If we can get better, do it.BrAinPaiNt;1903337 said:He is also a spark plug kind of player like Marion. I think our team needs more players like that. Players that are die hard guys who can provide a spark.