We Need Instant Gratification

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,563
You take some white flakes and add hot water, and wa la, instant mashed potatoes.

You take the cake mix out of the packet, stir it up, pop it in the oven and wa la, instant cake.

As a society we have become used to instant results. There's no longer time to make a cake from scratch. No time boil and peel potatoes and mash them up. Forget that it is better for you, tastes better, and teaches you something. We need instant gratification. It's why video games have taken the place of heading down to the schoolyard or the playground to actually play the game. Yeah, I can dunk a basketball, on my video game. Need a RB, simply suggest it to the game and he is yours.

Wa la.

Every week we wake up to reality staring us in the face of the football team we all love. Where is the instant gratification? Danged if I know.

The NFL is never going to provide people the instant gratification they want. I hate Kickers. David Buehler missed a PAT that could have sent this game to overtime. Cut him. Get the next guy in here and he will know instant gratification is expected and by all that is holy he will not miss a kick ever.

DC.com has not been working for me. A problem with my ISP here. I finally got to see Garrett's post game press conference and I am both shocked and not shocked that a reporter feels like Buehler is getting a pass. Much like the fans here, reporters want instant gratification. Guy misses a kick, we can write his eulogy and hang the guy. Don't you realize this is instant journalism? We can hang the goat and the curse will be lifted. Would you please just let us do our job and fix this team for you?

Yes, we know that 2 of the last 3 weeks he made kicks that won the game for our team, but he missed this one, and as we all know, we want instant gratification. We want to burn him in effigy. Let us.

It's a marvelous tragic opera each and every week. Stephen McGee played decent. I have an instant gratification idea. Let's trade Tony Romo to a QB starved team and get some instant potatoes. Forget building this team around him from scratch, let's go with an unproven rookie because the media says he is the next great thing. You know, like JaMarcus Russell and Ryan Leaf. Instant championship. Bobble erased. Happy, happy fans.

Have you ever noticed that one week a guy can screw something up, have the fans and media all over him, and a few weeks later he is the hero of the game? Talk about screwing up instant gratification. We're all guilty of it. Every one of us wanted Alex Barron gone as soon as he held that guy in week 1.

Now we want all emotion taken out of the game by the players. No happiness or joking on the sidelines. A sure way to attract the best players is to have them see how miserable you are on the sidelines. It's not a game and you should not enjoy it. This is life and death. Hey, there's no emotions on the sidelines in Madden. It must be a good thing then.

On Madden, when I am GM and Coach, the Cowboys win every single week. That's what I want. Yearly Super Bowls and other teams willing to simply hand me their best players to fulfill my need for instant gratification.

Hey, do they make this stuff in a powder? You know so you can stir it up in Milk? And can it come in chocolate? I think I'll pop a Hot Pocket into the microwave so I don't have to cook. It'll go right through me and I don't even have to be regular.

Who needs sex? A good scratch feels just as good.
 
Make sure that Jerry gets a copy of this. He is the leader of the circus.
 
The NFL is never going to provide people the instant gratification they want

In this NFL instant gratification isn't so rare.





Also I would like for the Cowboys to have the same type of post season success as franchises like the Colts, Steelers, and Patriots...


Is that a lot to ask for? Maybe if you're a Seahawk fan. Not if you're a Cowboy fan.


The bar should NEVER be lowered and fans need to keep their unrealistic expectations.

Because when things are taken for granted you get seasons like this.
 
Hostile;3764622 said:
Who needs sex? A good scratch feels just as good.

Ahh you covered it. My first smart *** remark was going to revolve around sex but you took away my fun.;)
 
Hostile;3764622 said:
You take some white flakes and add hot water, and wa la, instant mashed potatoes.

You take the cake mix out of the packet, stir it up, pop it in the oven and wa la, instant cake.

As a society we have become used to instant results. There's no longer time to make a cake from scratch. No time boil and peel potatoes and mash them up. Forget that it is better for you, tastes better, and teaches you something. We need instant gratification. It's why video games have taken the place of heading down to the schoolyard or the playground to actually play the game. Yeah, I can dunk a basketball, on my video game. Need a RB, simply suggest it to the game and he is yours.

Wa la.

Every week we wake up to reality staring us in the face of the football team we all love. Where is the instant gratification? Danged if I know.

The NFL is never going to provide people the instant gratification they want. I hate Kickers. David Buehler missed a PAT that could have sent this game to overtime. Cut him. Get the next guy in here and he will know instant gratification is expected and by all that is holy he will not miss a kick ever.

DC.com has not been working for me. A problem with my ISP here. I finally got to see Garrett's post game press conference and I am both shocked and not shocked that a reporter feels like Buehler is getting a pass. Much like the fans here, reporters want instant gratification. Guy misses a kick, we can write his eulogy and hang the guy. Don't you realize this is instant journalism? We can hang the goat and the curse will be lifted. Would you please just let us do our job and fix this team for you?

Yes, we know that 2 of the last 3 weeks he made kicks that won the game for our team, but he missed this one, and as we all know, we want instant gratification. We want to burn him in effigy. Let us.

It's a marvelous tragic opera each and every week. Stephen McGee played decent. I have an instant gratification idea. Let's trade Tony Romo to a QB starved team and get some instant potatoes. Forget building this team around him from scratch, let's go with an unproven rookie because the media says he is the next great thing. You know, like JaMarcus Russell and Ryan Leaf. Instant championship. Bobble erased. Happy, happy fans.

Have you ever noticed that one week a guy can screw something up, have the fans and media all over him, and a few weeks later he is the hero of the game? Talk about screwing up instant gratification. We're all guilty of it. Every one of us wanted Alex Barron gone as soon as he held that guy in week 1.

Now we want all emotion taken out of the game by the players. No happiness or joking on the sidelines. A sure way to attract the best players is to have them see how miserable you are on the sidelines. It's not a game and you should not enjoy it. This is life and death. Hey, there's no emotions on the sidelines in Madden. It must be a good thing then.

On Madden, when I am GM and Coach, the Cowboys win every single week. That's what I want. Yearly Super Bowls and other teams willing to simply hand me their best players to fulfill my need for instant gratification.

Hey, do they make this stuff in a powder? You know so you can stir it up in Milk? And can it come in chocolate? I think I'll pop a Hot Pocket into the microwave so I don't have to cook. It'll go right through me and I don't even have to be regular.

Who needs sex? A good scratch feels just as good.

As usual :hammer:
 
CATCH17;3764633 said:
Also I would like for the Cowboys to have the same type of post season success as franchises like the Colts, Steelers, and Patriots...


Is that a lot to ask for? Maybe if you're a Seahawk fan. Not if you're a Cowboy fan.


The bar should NEVER be lowered and fans need to keep their unrealistic expectations.

Because when things are taken for granted you get seasons like this.

My thoughts EXACTLY.
 
I agree with people being impatient but I wish we'd start acquiring players for the team we have instead of a slew of projects for the future. We have a top franchise QB and two very good RBs yet the oline continually gets ignored. We have top defensive players like Ware and Rat, yet we still don't have adequate safeties.
 
FWIW, David Akers missed 5 of 8 FGs as a rookie (Skins cut him after going 0-2, Philly stuck with him after going 3-6)

Billy Cundiff was a sub 80% here, but is up to 89% in Baltimore.

Adam Viniteri was a 77% kicker and missed 3 XPs as a rookie

I could go on and on, but the point is kickers take time to develop. Let Buehler finish the season. Bring in a kicker in training camp to compete with him. If he gets demoted to KOs only, then so be it, but there's no need to cut him yet.
 
Buehler missing a kick is the least of my concerns. I want my team built the right way. Jerry has his moments, but one playoff win over the last 12+ years is simply not good enough.

I don't want the owner of the Cowboys interviewed in the locker room right after a tough loss. I'm tired of Jerry calling the shots. At this point, isn't it fair to suggest after 12 years he's not getting it done as a GM? I know I'm beating a dead horse, but this isn't about instant anything for me.`
 
18 wins
46 losses
4 ties

Tom Landry's record over his first 5 seasons.

And we get yahwhos here who are having a fit because Jason Garrett could be 4-4 after inheriting a 1-7 team.
 
Most fans (assuming they're like me) don't want "instant gratification." They've been patient through 15 years of football futility and embarrassment for a storied franchise. This team again has gone from SB favorite a few short years ago to losing to the Cardinals and seeing a window of opportunity with a franchise QB almost close shut.

The problems for this team are just beginning. There are some serious question marks and we have a GM who has proven that he is ill equipped to solve them over the long haul but the excuses continue and the appologists circle the wagons.

In the late 90's it was the salary cap that hampered Jerry, not his poor drafts....or at least that was the excuse at that time. Fast forward to 2009 and he did the same thing that failed a decade ago when he drafted backups after throwing away valuable draft picks on a WR. This team is in serious trouble and it will take more than a coaching change to turn it around.
 
MichaelWinicki;3764697 said:
18 wins
46 losses
4 ties

Tom Landry's record over his first 5 seasons.

And we get yahwhos here who are having a fit because Jason Garrett could be 4-4 after inheriting a 1-7 team.

There is a HUGE difference between starting a team from scratch, without even the benefit of a draft and having to give up high draft picks for a couple of years in order to get players, and taking over a team that had SB expectations going into the season.

Not a very good comparison.
 
THUMPER;3764781 said:
There is a HUGE difference between starting a team from scratch, without even the benefit of a draft and having to give up high draft picks for a couple of years in order to get players, and taking over a team that had SB expectations going into the season.

Not a very good comparison.

A terrible, agenda-filled comparison.

What is this instant gratification BS? It's not like we've been a 3-13 team the past few years. We've been "Super Bowl contenders" since like 2005, except we've never actually contended for a Super Bowl.

Now, just because everyone wants Jason Garrett to be HC, they're all, "it's ok if he has a bad season next year, Tom Landry and Jimmy Johnson had bad seasons their first full years". EXCEPT, Tom Landry took an expansion team and Jimmy Johnson took over a TERRIBLE team. Yeah, we were 1-7, but we have a good, solid roster that SHOULD be a Super Bowl contender. At this point, it's been 5 years, and I don't think we as a fanbase should settle for anything less than a NFC Championship visit, at LEAST.
 
THUMPER;3764781 said:
There is a HUGE difference between starting a team from scratch, without even the benefit of a draft and having to give up high draft picks for a couple of years in order to get players, and taking over a team that had SB expectations going into the season.

Not a very good comparison.

All the comparisions made in the thread so far i don’t get. I guess i don’t see where we are cutting corners for instant gratification.

I also never understand the knocks on Madden the video game. I love the game and i play it every now and then when i have time. Some how if you play it you have no clue about real football. How ridiculous.
 
DragonCowboy;3764792 said:
A terrible, agenda-filled comparison.

What is this instant gratification BS? It's not like we've been a 3-13 team the past few years. We've been "Super Bowl contenders" since like 2005, except we've never actually contended for a Super Bowl.

Now, just because everyone wants Jason Garrett to be HC, they're all, "it's ok if he has a bad season next year, Tom Landry and Jimmy Johnson had bad seasons their first full years". EXCEPT, Tom Landry took an expansion team and Jimmy Johnson took over a TERRIBLE team. Yeah, we were 1-7, but we have a good, solid roster that SHOULD be a Super Bowl contender. At this point, it's been 5 years, and I don't think we as a fanbase should settle for anything less than a NFC Championship visit, at LEAST.

Wah, wah, wah.
 
Man for instant gratification I sure picked the wrong team... 15 years and counting...
 
Dodger12;3764758 said:
This team again has gone from SB favorite a few short years ago to losing to the Cardinals and seeing a window of opportunity with a franchise QB almost close shut.

Almost close shut? The window for this team is WIDE open for at least another 5 years. Romo, Witten, Miles, Dez and Ware are ALL 30 and under. Now we just need to start filling in the gaps or the window will eventually close.
 
DragonCowboy;3764792 said:
A terrible, agenda-filled comparison.

What is this instant gratification BS? It's not like we've been a 3-13 team the past few years. We've been "Super Bowl contenders" since like 2005, except we've never actually contended for a Super Bowl.

Now, just because everyone wants Jason Garrett to be HC, they're all, "it's ok if he has a bad season next year, Tom Landry and Jimmy Johnson had bad seasons their first full years". EXCEPT, Tom Landry took an expansion team and Jimmy Johnson took over a TERRIBLE team. Yeah, we were 1-7, but we have a good, solid roster that SHOULD be a Super Bowl contender.
:hammer:
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,776
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top