NextGenBoys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,252
- Reaction score
- 1,964
sago1;2055891 said:My problem is we so often use the excuse that any rookie we start won't be a starter; result, we don't draft a WR. Heck, same thing applies to a QB; very few QBs are immediate starters so why don't all NFL teams stop drafting QBs. Most teams realize you gotta draft a WR or a QB at some point and give them time to develop. TO will be 40 before Jerry gets off his butt and finally pushes the button to draft a WR; he'd rather pay big money for a vet WR but what happens if he can't get the other team to trade that player to him.
Teams that are set to "win now" dont draft QB's.
If we were in a different situation, and wanted to take time to develop a WR, we would take one. But we're in a win now situation and have the luxury with a talented team of being picky with our draft picks and taking players that will help out immediately.