what are our "weak" positions?

[theogt]

I don't think AZ does it for only a #1, and if they do its Clevelands. (I'm not sure why Detroit would trade Williams at all)

How about a 1st and a 2nd or 3rd for Larry?

I'd give the Cleveland 1st and our 3rd for Fitzgerald. We'd still have a 1st and 2nd rounder to play with.

 

[iceberg]

I don't think AZ does it for only a #1, and if they do its Clevelands. (I'm not sure why Detroit would trade Williams at all)

How about a 1st and a 2nd or 3rd for Larry?

I'd give the Cleveland 1st and our 3rd for Fitzgerald. We'd still have a 1st and 2nd rounder to play with.

well so far it's all speculation on my part based on some early reads and past AZ history but i'd float them an offer and see what happened.

 

[BlueStar II]

As long as we don't take a LB or TE with our early picks, I'll be happy. I can easily see us choosing between either CB, WR, or RB with our early picks. If McFadden is there when we are on the clock, take him, but I wouldn't lose sleep over it one way or the other though. If the draft were tomorrow, I think we would initially focus more closely on which CBs were available when it's our time to pick, but with WR and RB also being given "strong" consideration as well.

 

[iceberg]

As long as we don't take a LB or TE with our early picks, I'll be happy. I can easily see us choosing between either CB, WR, or RB with our early picks. If McFadden is there when we are on the clock, take him, but I wouldn't lose sleep over it one way or the other though. If the draft were tomorrow, I think we would initially focus more closely on which CBs were available when it's our time to pick, but with WR and RB also being given "strong" consideration as well.

i think CB is going to be a stronger need when the time comes around so i can see us going CB early. supposed to be a weak class for CBs but you never really know. lots to play and many camps to go through first before we can really evaluate the players.