juckie;2866442 said:As compared to "Wildcat".
theogt;2866485 said:A scheme where we take our best offensive player off the field.
theogt;2866485 said:A scheme where we take our best offensive player off the field.
juckie;2866442 said:As compared to "Wildcat".
ArmyCowboy;2866502 said:Same formation, different name.
juckie;2866505 said:So Romo would flush out as a WR? Or would he not be on the field?
juckie;2866505 said:So Romo would flush out as a WR? Or would he not be on the field?
You can do that without taking away the threat of one of the best passers in the NFL.speedkilz88;2866638 said:Do people not understand that Felix is an incredible open field runner? The point of the formation is too get Felix out in the open field.
ArmyCowboy;2866509 said:Yeah, in the "True" wildcat, he'd line up at WR.
That's the problem I have with the formation, too. Putting your QB out there at WR where every DB can tee off on him.
I doubt Romo or any other qb will be worried about a cb.joseephuss;2866650 said:Every DB or LB should tee off on the QB if he splits out as a wide receiver. As soon as the ball is snapped the nearest defender should just hit the snot out of the QB. That should be the first step in defending the "wildcat" formation.
zrinkill;2866487 said:Its the same ..... different terminology.
RoadRunner;2866854 said:Alright, now give us a dissertation on the "six two stack monster".