droopdog7
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,680
- Reaction score
- 5,404
It’s a rule as old as football, seen dozens of times each game. You almost have to understand this rule to watch football.They said his progress was stopped or something stupid
It’s a rule as old as football, seen dozens of times each game. You almost have to understand this rule to watch football.They said his progress was stopped or something stupid
Yeah, every dang game. That is how the rule works and it makes complete sense logically.That was their attempt at an explanation. Weak one at that. Has there ever been that same situation where the clock doesn’t stop because his progress had stopped? The refs blow the whistle to kill the play in that situation and they didn’t end the play. Too many “mistakes” by the refs to be explained away.
Yet MMs winning percetange with dak would probably put him number one all timeSorry, I was talking about Rodgers. Dak is a good qb, but no.
MM has his strengths, but it appears he needs a strong offensive coordinator. I hope I'm wrong, and this offense comes together.
There was only 1 timeout left.so why no timeout with 2 left?
LOL...........When you have little faith in your QB throwing into the endzone you play for a FG.Do we know why we lost 5 seconds, was it on the refs, on the coach or what??
What do you meanIt’s a rule as old as football, seen dozens of times each game. You almost have to understand this rule to watch football.
If Dallas had converted in the Red Zone with three minutes remaining in the 2nd quarter, and not missed on the 12 yard line on a 4th and one...the game would have developed much differently up to the muffed punt penalty movement by San Diego and a difference of 14 points removed from the score board as well. Two cheap segments of short duration that changed the entire dynamics of this whole game. Dallas with 7 and San Diego without 7 and Cowboys walk off instead with a STRONG win.NFLN said the clock operator assumed a TO. But none was called. But they stopped the clock anyway.
A video showed MM telling the ref to ... wind the clock ...
MM took the sure points because he knew it was turning into a defensive game. As what was going to really happen as LAC was not going to get the chance to score, and they were getting the ball to start the 2nd half.
It was the right thing to do, especially passing on the FG earlier.
This should be the main topic of this thread. How the clock was managed prior to not calling timeout with 8 seconds is the bigger issue. MM couldnt manage the clock when literally that was his only job let alone trying to call plays too.I want to know how we got from 44 seconds after the gallup catch to 21 seconds. Wasn't he out of bounds? And if not we had 2 timeouts why didn't we use one? I would rather have a 13 year old madden player than mccarthy with time management.
Keep reading im fine with that but y no timeout then by our dumb dumb coach?Gallup forward momentum was stopped and pushed back. In that case, you get the forwarded progress but not the out of bounds. It’s a basic rule that was called correctly.
I'm not going to lie; i was calling for a timeout after that play too. As I recall, we then committed a penalty on that play, compounding the issue. However, once we got to eight seconds after the next play, I was 100% on board with just kicking the FG.Keep reading im fine with that but y no timeout then by our dumb dumb coach?