What I might like to see in our secondary next year...

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
Rampage;1847593 said:
you and your agenda:rolleyes:

Kind of was.

Title asked about the secondary and then he conveniently switched over to RW doesn't deserve the Pro-Bowl.

How quickly things change by accident

:rolleyes:

EDIT: It was actually post #3!!!! that changed gears.
 

esloan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,389
stealth;1847594 said:
I like that the only people I can read in this thread are smarta and myself, this is my new favorite thread

Nothing like ignoring people you dont agree with. I bet your daily life is miserable.

I haven't been rude or anything to anyone, just posting my thoughts.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
esloan;1847598 said:
Nothing like ignoring people you dont agree with. I bet your daily life is miserable.

I haven't been rude or anything to anyone, just posting my thoughts.

You started another thread when you could have easily voiced your opinion in 1 of the 12 threads about Roy Williams.
 

esloan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,389
smarta5150;1847595 said:
Kind of was.

Title asked about the secondary and then he conveniently switched over to RW doesn't deserve the Pro-Bowl.

How quickly things change by accident

:rolleyes:

EDIT: It was actually post #3!!!! that changed gears.

Now hold up there, I brought up Williams in my initial post, you guys challenged it and I continued the debate with my justification. It wasn't "convenient" it was the point of the thread and then my justification for it.

 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
Rampage;1847599 said:
:laugh2: nothing like i nice roy debate before you go to bed

I thought we were gonna discuss the secondary...

Like how much will Hamlin cost to keep around or who are we gonna draft to play CB in the many years to come or how is Watkins gonna fit in when he gets more time or so on.

Then on the OP's 1st reply its all about Roy Williams.

He can't just reply on 1 of the many other threads?
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
esloan;1847602 said:
Now hold up there, I brought up Williams in my initial post, you guys challenged it and I continued the debate with my justification. It wasn't "convenient" it was the point of the thread and then my justification for it.

smarta5150;1847564 said:
I am beginning to want whatever will stop these threads from happening.


Where did I challenge anything?
 

esloan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,389
smarta5150;1847600 said:
You started another thread when you could have easily voiced your opinion in 1 of the 12 threads about Roy Williams.

I started another thread because my point was not to argue about Williams but to get peoples thoughts on Henry at safety. It deteriorated to an arguement about Williams. Which I really didnt intend.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
smarta5150;1847603 said:
I thought we were gonna discuss the secondary...

Like how much will Hamlin cost to keep around or who are we gonna draft to play CB in the many years to come or how is Watkins gonna fit in when he gets more time or so on.

Then on the OP's 1st reply its all about Roy Williams.

He can't just reply on 1 of the many other threads?
he said "what he would like to see with our secondary" he also did not praise roy so you decided to argue with him. trust me i know how these roy threads go one way or another. i'm a roy thread veteran lol
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
esloan;1847606 said:
I started another thread because my point was not to argue about Williams but to get peoples thoughts on Henry at safety. It deteriorated to an arguement about Williams. Which I really didnt intend.

lol then why did you mention RW?

All you had to say was, "thanks for your great knowledge about nothing" since I didn't contribute to anything regarding your OP :laugh2:
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
Rampage;1847607 said:
he said "what he would like to see with our secondary" he also did not praise roy so you decided to argue with him. trust me i know how these roy threads go one way or another. i'm a roy thread veteran lol

Wow.

Read #1, #2 and #3.

Then edit this post.
 

esloan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,389
hmm, I dont know...

Maybe because it was obvious you were talking about Williams?

Anyway, I think Im going to bed, gotta work tomorrow.

Oh, how I hate the holidays in retail.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
esloan;1847612 said:
hmm, I dont know...

Maybe because it was obvious you were talking about Williams?

Anyway, I think Im going to bed, gotta work tomorrow.

Oh, how I hate the holidays in retail.


Actually I disagree with Henry to Safety too.
 

esloan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,010
Reaction score
1,389
smarta5150;1847614 said:
Actually I disagree with Henry to Safety too.


Dont think he could play safety?

He hits pretty well, covers nicely and is a ball hawk. I think he would be great at free.
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
Rampage;1847618 said:
my bad it was stealth:eek:hno:


Thats right, 1st thing you got right in a Roy Williams thread in... gimme one sec, 2x3 is 6, multiply by 32, carry the 1..................... never.

Congrats ;) :p:
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
smarta5150;1847622 said:
Thats right, 1st thing you got right in a Roy Williams thread in... gimme one sec, 2x3 is 6, multiply by 32, carry the 1..................... never.

Congrats ;) :p:
:laugh2: hey man you see roy playing good and i don't. that ain't gonna change unless he starts making some plays imo
 
Top