What is the main difference between the explosiveness

[smarta5150]

they flat out don't need a running game. their offense is much better i think. we don't really know how good their running game is. they never run.

We shutdown their "Running game."

And thats when they started to pass all over us.

Remember Wade took **** for saying... "we wanted to make Brady beat us."

 

[RodBro]

All that we need to beat the Pats is ---
1. Terry Glenn back or Miles Austin being an effective deep threat
2. Newman back in the slot on Welker
3. Punish their front seven with the running game early and often

Take away the 3rd down domination of Wes Welker and spread their secondary a little thinner and beat down their d line and we romp all over those boys.

 

[Hoofbite]

The Pats are allowed to hold at will.

 

[DALLAS D]

of the Cowboys offense this year versus the Pats' "unstoppable" offense (thus far, at least)?

Is it that the Pats basically have one additional "accomplished" WR?

When I look at the running game, I prefer ours.

As for TEs, I'll take our group.

OL? Both have done an outstanding job thus far this season.

QB? Brady is having an exceptional season. But Romo is doing very, very well.

OCs? Garrett is calling very good game plans all in all.

Is the difference than Moss, Welker, Stallworth, Gaffney versus TO, Crayton, Hurd, and Austin? I'd guess so.

OK, let's assume we DO get Glenn back in the next week or two. And I'll also assume that Glenn will probably be a role player. Maybe 25-35% of the snaps on offense . . . .

Does this potentially take our offense to yet another level?

So, then it's Pats' Moss, Welker, Stallworth, and Gaffney versus TO, Crrayton, Glenn, and Hurd.

It seems much more even now, no? Plus, we probably have the better running game and the better group of TEs.

We can always sneak in a touchdown with good ole TD Curtis too.