What the heck was that review before the Maher 60 yard field goal before the half?

[MarionBarberThe4th]

Heads better roll cmon that’s some clownery

 

[baltcowboy]

Heads better roll cmon that’s some clownery

Your owner decides to make fun of the referees at a Halloween party. There’s gonna be consequences.

 

[Prossman]

agreed, the next play had already been ran. , garbage call

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

Your owner decides to make fun of the referees at a Halloween party. There’s gonna be consequences.

I mean honestly

 

[GMO415]

Heads better roll cmon that’s some clownery

WORST OFFICIATING EVER

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

agreed, the next play had already been ran. , garbage call

And once again I find myself watching an entirely different game than the commentators. I’m like this catch is a catch just shut up you chowder heads

 

[baltcowboy]

I mean honestly

I think it was an effort to keep the game close. This was the prime time game of the week.

 

[cowboyec]

it was clearly....
CRAPOLA

 

[GMO415]

agreed, the next play had already been ran. , garbage call

Historical. Once the next play was snapped the previous call is OVER

 

[thunderpimp91]

Seemed really odd. The one thing I did notice was the two officials by the goalpost one signaled the FG was good and the other just stood there and looked at him like *** are you doing? It almost seemed like maybe something did come in over the radio right before the snap or something? Idk for sure but it’s very rare an official just stands there. Even if they didn’t get a great look at the kick they tend to mimic what the other is doing.

 

[links18]

They are going to say there was no snap, because the call to review came in before the snap, like a last second time out to ice kicker, the ball might get snapped, but it's a "non play." Not saying this is right, but that's going to be the league's line on this.

 

[Richmond Cowboy]

Since the next play had already been executed, and of course a review not legally possible, at the very least once they found that it was a catch the kick should have stood. Imagine if that would have been a game deciding play?

 

[MarionBarberThe4th]

They are going to say there was no snap, because the call to review came in before the snap, like a last second time out to ice kicker, the ball might get snapped, but it's a "non play." Not saying this is right, but that's going to be the league's line on this.

Which begs more questions. Why wait so long? Why review it anyways really? He caught it

 

[Praxit]

..yep, that was a wierd one. Then Maher, does it again... lol..

 

[ClappingCarrot]

All time bizarre sequence but so on brand.

Refs tried to ice your kicker, but it didn't even matter.

 

[Proximo]

That was absolutely insane.
Retroactively reviewing the prior play AFTER a scoring play?
Big props to Maher for drilling TWO SIXTY yard field goals within a couple of minutes of each other.

 

[Kevinicus]

agreed, the next play had already been ran. , garbage call

The delay was extreme, but we've all seen plenty of plays ran over the years where they come back and say they were buzzed before the snap.

Surprised at so many pretending they haven't. Selective memory, I guess?

 

[Kevinicus]

They are going to say there was no snap, because the call to review came in before the snap, like a last second time out to ice kicker, the ball might get snapped, but it's a "non play." Not saying this is right, but that's going to be the league's line on this.

That is indeed what the officials said when it happened.

 

[BigWillie]

Don't forget there was a timeout by us after the catch, as the play clock was running out.

There was all the time in the world to call for that review, or for the booth to look at it long before they ever buzzed down.

 

[cmoney23]

Complete BS.

1. We completed it.
2. Ran out the play clock.
3. CALLED A FREAKING TIMEOUT.
4. Sat around for the timeout.
5. Lined up and kicked a 60 yarder.

THEN they review the catch!!!!!!???!!!

Bull crap.