What's the delay on the releases?

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
SLATEmosphere;2647173 said:
Seems like alot of teams are already unloading some players..what's taking so long to release some of our "no brainers"?

Henry making 5 million next year as a 4th CB

Ellis making 6.6 million as a whiny OLB that plays 15 plays a game.

RW making 7 million as a liability in the passing game.

Is Jerry just assessing the roster right now? Because I can't imagine why these guys are on the roster right now. We can save a ton of money.

Just waiting for the combine? Or you think he's planning doing some trading during the draft?

I personally would like to see Bobby and Henry to Miami for a 4th. Similiar to what we did last year with Akin and Fasano. Akin was a cost cut just like Henry and Bowles loves him.


What I wanna know is why there aren't performance laden type provisions in these block buster contracts? Aside from injuries, if a player gets paid and then starts to get fat and lazy, his salary needs to drop and so does this darn cap hit we keep hearing about. Does Jerry have some crappy lawyers or what???:bang2:
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
SLATEmosphere;2647173 said:
Is Jerry just assessing the roster right now? Because I can't imagine why these guys are on the roster right now. We can save a ton of money.

You obviously believed that "woodshed" nonsense.
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
AbeBeta;2647497 said:
From what I understand, if we cut Greg Ellis, we are losing a very solid pass rusher....

he's NOT A GOOD PASS RUSHER!!

when 2 of your fellow DLinemen are drawing double protection, it's easy to get pressure.

DWare and JRatliff were both drawing two men almost everytime. the fact that he didn't have more sacks/tackles is proof that he isn't worth his money.

also, Anthony Henry is old and slow. he doesn't need to start as a CB next year.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
Audiman;2648269 said:
he's NOT A GOOD PASS RUSHER!!

when 2 of your fellow DLinemen are drawing double protection, it's easy to get pressure.

DWare and JRatliff were both drawing two men almost everytime. the fact that he didn't have more sacks/tackles is proof that he isn't worth his money.

First, whoever is blocking Ratliff wouldn't be too likely to be helping on Ellis b/c Greg is coming from the outside.

Second, if it is SO easy, why haven't other guys in that spot, e.g., Al Singleton, had similar performances? Ellis has over 20 sacks in two seasons -- not even two full seasons at that. That's outstanding production.
 

28 Joker

28 Joker
Messages
7,878
Reaction score
1
Greg Ellis counts $ 6.25 million against the cap. That's what he will cost to keep. His base salary will be $ 4.15 million. According to some sources I looked at (including Clarence Hill), Ellis will save the Cowboys 5.6 million dollars if he is cut.

Is Greg Ellis worth $ 6.25 million to keep?

No. Cut him or trade him and save $ 5.6 million bucks. Other teams wouldn't hesitate to cut him and save this money. The Cowboys have averaged 10.1 wins since 2005, with a mode of 9. Plug in the younger player, a number one pick, and move on. It's called fiscal responsibility.


Anthony Henry will count $5.6 million dollars to keep in 2009. He is due a $ 1 million dollar roster bonus. Cutting Henry will save $ 3.6 million dollars for the Cowboys to use else where. Henry has a base salary of 2.6 million, plus a $ 1 million dollar roster bonus. The Cowboys have two younger, cheaper, and faster players to replace Henry. (Again, see Greg Ellis)

Is Anthony Henry worth $ 5.6 million dollars to keep? No.

Cut or trade him. It should be a no brainer. Two young players are on the roster and ready to compete for that job. Heny isn't the answer at safety. Allan Ball played well against Tampa Bay and when he played. He moves up.


Cutting Henry and Ellis would save Dallas $ 9.2 million dollars, but they would cost you $ 11.85 million dollars to keep.


I'm not the cap guru, but just look at what it costs to keep these two players.

If I'm correct in what I've read, cutting Roy Williams allows Dallas not to pay $ 9 million dollars owed to Roy Williams over the next 2 years. $2.4 million dollars would be saved against the 2009 cap.

Roy says that the 3-4 doesn't suite him. I would let him go. The "in the box" safety just doesn't fit the game, anymore. The game has changed. Williams isn't even a three down player, anymore.

That's $ 11.85 million + $ 2.4 million = $ 14.25 million dollars saved.


Greg Ellis
Anthony Henry
Roy Williams

In my opinion, all these players should be cut or traded if possible.


I don't think Bobby Carpenter is safe, either. He might be dealt to a certain coach in Miami. I would shop Crayton, too.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
41gy#;2648312 said:
The Cowboys have averaged 10.1 wins since 2005, with a mode of 9.

That's a stupid statistic.

Here's the one that matters.

The Cowboys have averaged 0 playoff wins a year since 1997. With a mode of 0. What the hell. The median number of playoff wins is also 0.
 

LandryFan

Proud Native Texan, USMC-1972-79, USN-1983-2000
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
6,347
TLCC;2647411 said:
Brad Johnson we save over 2 million in cap space. Can't undertand why we haven't cut him already?
I might be wrong, but I thought BJ was an UFA. If so, no need to cut him, just let the FA period begin and he's history.
Does anyone know if he is UFA?
 

Oh_Canada

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,083
Reaction score
4,222
41gy#;2648163 said:
Greg Ellis finished with 8 sacks, but look at his season. I will ignore his bad attitude and need to run to Uncle Jerry. The guy didn't come out of a game one time when he was asked to come out, but let's stick to his production on the field.

For the first 9 weeks, Ellis had 3 sacks. During this stretch, Ellis had a seven game stretch where he recorded 1 sack. Two sacks came in week 2 against the Eagles.

During weeks 11-17, Ellis recorded 5 sacks. 2.5 of those sacks came against the Giants, and their RT left that game with an injury.

Ellis turns 34 in August. It's time to move on. Third down rushers don't make what Ellis is going to cost in cap room next season. If 4.5 million can be saved by cutting Ellis, like TLCC stated, then, it's a no brainer.

Anthony Spencer belongs to Dallas. He's their guy. They drafted him number 26 overall in round 1.

Time to let him play every down, or you can continue to take him off the field on third down and play a declining, aging, complaining, and selfish player.

By the way, Amonte Toomer is still running.

I agree with you, if there is ONE player who needs to go it's Ellis...he has a loser mentality and will always be a loser....buh bye.

They can probably sign Kalimba Edwards for half the price and let Spencer start who will match his production with his PT at the very minimum.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
CowboyFan74;2648200 said:
What I wanna know is why there aren't performance laden type provisions in these block buster contracts? Aside from injuries, if a player gets paid and then starts to get fat and lazy, his salary needs to drop and so does this darn cap hit we keep hearing about. Does Jerry have some crappy lawyers or what???:bang2:


Find an agent of a healthy player who will accept that kind of contract and I will show you an agent with no players
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Audiman;2648269 said:
he's NOT A GOOD PASS RUSHER!!

when 2 of your fellow DLinemen are drawing double protection, it's easy to get pressure.

DWare and JRatliff were both drawing two men almost everytime. the fact that he didn't have more sacks/tackles is proof that he isn't worth his money.

also, Anthony Henry is old and slow. he doesn't need to start as a CB next year.

See AbeBeta below. If you have a replacement then I agree. If you don't then you can't cut him. You could offer him to restructure but I doubt he'd do it and restructuring implies more years which I wouldn't do. It all depends on replacing him. You can't go into a 'SB year' with no backup at OLB in a 3-4. No pass rush is a disaster for this defense.

AbeBeta;2648308 said:
First, whoever is blocking Ratliff wouldn't be too likely to be helping on Ellis b/c Greg is coming from the outside.

Second, if it is SO easy, why haven't other guys in that spot, e.g., Al Singleton, had similar performances? Ellis has over 20 sacks in two seasons -- not even two full seasons at that. That's outstanding production.

41gy#;2648312 said:
Greg Ellis counts $ 6.25 million against the cap. That's what he will cost to keep. His base salary will be $ 4.15 million. According to some sources I looked at (including Clarence Hill), Ellis will save the Cowboys 5.6 million dollars if he is cut.

Is Greg Ellis worth $ 6.25 million to keep?

No. Cut him or trade him and save $ 5.6 million bucks. Other teams wouldn't hesitate to cut him and save this money. The Cowboys have averaged 10.1 wins since 2005, with a mode of 9. Plug in the younger player, a number one pick, and move on. It's called fiscal responsibility.


Anthony Henry will count $5.6 million dollars to keep in 2009. He is due a $ 1 million dollar roster bonus. Cutting Henry will save $ 3.6 million dollars for the Cowboys to use else where. Henry has a base salary of 2.6 million, plus a $ 1 million dollar roster bonus. The Cowboys have two younger, cheaper, and faster players to replace Henry. (Again, see Greg Ellis)

Is Anthony Henry worth $ 5.6 million dollars to keep? No.

Cut or trade him. It should be a no brainer. Two young players are on the roster and ready to compete for that job. Heny isn't the answer at safety. Allan Ball played well against Tampa Bay and when he played. He moves up.


Cutting Henry and Ellis would save Dallas $ 9.2 million dollars, but they would cost you $ 11.85 million dollars to keep.


I'm not the cap guru, but just look at what it costs to keep these two players.

If I'm correct in what I've read, cutting Roy Williams allows Dallas not to pay $ 9 million dollars owed to Roy Williams over the next 2 years. $2.4 million dollars would be saved against the 2009 cap.

Roy says that the 3-4 doesn't suite him. I would let him go. The "in the box" safety just doesn't fit the game, anymore. The game has changed. Williams isn't even a three down player, anymore.

That's $ 11.85 million + $ 2.4 million = $ 14.25 million dollars saved.


Greg Ellis
Anthony Henry
Roy Williams

In my opinion, all these players should be cut or traded if possible.


I don't think Bobby Carpenter is safe, either. He might be dealt to a certain coach in Miami. I would shop Crayton, too.

You must ask yourself who is going to play someone's position and how critical is that position for you, before cutting someone just for money. You're here to win not spend or save money although I'm not arguing it is not important. Just not as important as winning. Money is the tool to collect talent.

IMO, Ellis should go if you have a replacement. You can't go into a SB season without a 3rd OLB in the 3-4. Well, you can but it's very risky. I don't know who that replacement is. Do you?

RW should go unless they can find him a position to succeed better in just looking at money. I don't know what that position/scheme is although they could consider moving him to LB where I see zero chance of working. But are there at least two safeties on this team that are of the caliper this team needs? I don't know but I'd say no right now. Hopefully I'm wrong or either someone will step up in time. This team missed RW at times last year despite him not being the best cover safety you would like. That just says something about the position of safety on this team but it doesn't negate his relative value. Again can you replace him? I'd say yes but you could toss a coin for that answer AFAIK.

You have to have five CBs and 4 safeties. Can you cut Henry and replace him? Can he transition to safety? I'd say he can play FS and probably do it well, IMO. I'd keep him unless they can trade him for appropriate value.

Is Carpenter that bad? I don't know. Does he save you that much money that it's worth cutting him? Don't know? I'd say no until they can upgrade the position of ILB. I don't see him as an OLB.

Crayton is not going to save that much money nor bring you as could a pick as you'd like. I'd keep him.

JMO.
 
Top