CanadianCowboysFan;1315190 said:I think in this case though, saying the Chargers lost more than the Patriots won is pretty accurate.
The Chargers gave them three points on the fumbled punt and the conduct penalty, then had the game all but won with the INT only to fumble it away. Then Marty challenged the play, burned a time out which if you add 40 seconds to the game clock for the Chargers at the end, not only might they have gotten closer for a FG, they might have scored a TD to win the game.
dfense;1315479 said:Well, they did. Picking off a pass on 4th down? When simply batting it down would give you the ball 10 yards further upfield, Stupid. Sack, forced fumble on 4-13. Then 15 yard headbutt. Stupid. Losing a TO to review an obvious fumble. Stupid. And there's more. Preventing any one of those things could have won them the game.
smarta5150;1315407 said:We lost the Seattle game... they didnt win that game![]()
BHendri5;1315998 said:No, we got beat. There is no way that we should not have been torching their secondary, along with running the ball like we did.
There is no way that their TEs should have been catching passes down the middle of the field like they were.
Terry Glenn should not have been the recepient of that short pass on the goalline, it should have been T.O., who should have had more than just 3 passes tossed his way, and Glenn 4. We should have just lined up and ran the ball on the goalline gave it to MB3, who should have been our starting RB all season, getting the majority of the carries, I have been saying this since Jones's rookie season that he is not a franchise RB.
We used T.O. wrong all season long, you do not have to run the WCO to run the same patterns that T.O. made a living off of in Cisco and philly, those patterns are ran all offensive systems.
No fella, we got beat, it may seem that we gave them the game with the bobbled hold on the field goal attempt, but if we had a good game plan in place we wouldhave been so far ahead in that game a bobbled hold would not have mattered. Plus if we had lined up to kick on the 3rd down instead of the 4th down we would have had another attempt to rund down some more clock and another shot at the field goal.
Now I will say this, I believe Witten had the first down, and I believe Romo got the first down again on his run for the end zone.
Now, I blame Parcells for not asking his guys in the box to ask for a review of the Witten catch and spot.
CATCH17;1316007 said:I don't even think the Seahawks players would Agree with you.
It took a MONUMENTAL BREAKDOWN on our parts for them to win.
Anyone with 2 eyes knows that.
Regardless of what you think the gameplan was good enough for us to advance to the 2nd round of the playoffs.
Players just screwed it up.
BHendri5;1316021 said:LOL, that was good, I got a good laugh, I know you watched the Eagles and Saints, the Ravens and Colts, the chargers and patriots and the bears and hawks play in the seocnd round of the playoffs this past weeked, just like I did, not once did I see the Dallas Cowboys trot out on a football field.
So that tells me our gameplan was not good enough to get us past the first round, I mean that was a hint and a half for your a--.
Come on now Quincy.
How bout the coaches screwed it up,(gameplan) and that the Seahawks players did not and will not say anything that you just tried to make it seem that they would say.
They talked about seizing the moment, and destiny, when interviewed about the game with the Cowboys, they were confident that even if we had made the field goal that they were still going to come out on top with a last minute drive down the field and win.