When you win you win, & when you lose you lose

CanadianCowboysFan;1315190 said:
I think in this case though, saying the Chargers lost more than the Patriots won is pretty accurate.

The Chargers gave them three points on the fumbled punt and the conduct penalty, then had the game all but won with the INT only to fumble it away. Then Marty challenged the play, burned a time out which if you add 40 seconds to the game clock for the Chargers at the end, not only might they have gotten closer for a FG, they might have scored a TD to win the game.

No, they did not give them 3 points, they tried to stop them but could not.
the fumbled punt, lack of concentration, or just plain took his eye off the ball, for whatever reason, and he failed to fall on it, so once again the Patriots took it and the Chargers could not stop them, simply they got beat.
 
dfense;1315479 said:
Well, they did. Picking off a pass on 4th down? When simply batting it down would give you the ball 10 yards further upfield, Stupid. Sack, forced fumble on 4-13. Then 15 yard headbutt. Stupid. Losing a TO to review an obvious fumble. Stupid. And there's more. Preventing any one of those things could have won them the game.

They still lost, with all that you posted, they still had to line up and stop the Patriots, and theresult was that they could not. They may have been good, but yet they were not good enough to stop the Patriots from being close enough atthe end of the game to win it.

They simply got beat, nothing else can explain it. Youcan believe what you want to believe,if it makes you feel better, but the bottom line is they got beat.

Now the headbutt, thing to me that is a ridiculous penalty, they are wearing helmits, now since they cannot take their helmits off on the field without incurring a penalty now that was a bad call by the ref and it should be taken out of the rule book. But I'll give you the Marty bone headed request for the replay of a clear fumble, I honestly believe he thought he was going to get some homecooking from the officials. LOL
 
smarta5150;1315407 said:
We lost the Seattle game... they didnt win that game ;)

No, we got beat. There is no way that we should not have been torching their secondary, along with running the ball like we did.

There is no way that their TEs should have been catching passes down the middle of the field like they were.

Terry Glenn should not have been the recepient of that short pass on the goalline, it should have been T.O., who should have had more than just 3 passes tossed his way, and Glenn 4. We should have just lined up and ran the ball on the goalline gave it to MB3, who should have been our starting RB all season, getting the majority of the carries, I have been saying this since Jones's rookie season that he is not a franchise RB.

We used T.O. wrong all season long, you do not have to run the WCO to run the same patterns that T.O. made a living off of in Cisco and philly, those patterns are ran all offensive systems.

No fella, we got beat, it may seem that we gave them the game with the bobbled hold on the field goal attempt, but if we had a good game plan in place we wouldhave been so far ahead in that game a bobbled hold would not have mattered. Plus if we had lined up to kick on the 3rd down instead of the 4th down we would have had another attempt to rund down some more clock and another shot at the field goal.

Now I will say this, I believe Witten had the first down, and I believe Romo got the first down again on his run for the end zone.

Now, I blame Parcells for not asking his guys in the box to ask for a review of the Witten catch and spot.
 
BHendri5;1315998 said:
No, we got beat. There is no way that we should not have been torching their secondary, along with running the ball like we did.

There is no way that their TEs should have been catching passes down the middle of the field like they were.

Terry Glenn should not have been the recepient of that short pass on the goalline, it should have been T.O., who should have had more than just 3 passes tossed his way, and Glenn 4. We should have just lined up and ran the ball on the goalline gave it to MB3, who should have been our starting RB all season, getting the majority of the carries, I have been saying this since Jones's rookie season that he is not a franchise RB.

We used T.O. wrong all season long, you do not have to run the WCO to run the same patterns that T.O. made a living off of in Cisco and philly, those patterns are ran all offensive systems.

No fella, we got beat, it may seem that we gave them the game with the bobbled hold on the field goal attempt, but if we had a good game plan in place we wouldhave been so far ahead in that game a bobbled hold would not have mattered. Plus if we had lined up to kick on the 3rd down instead of the 4th down we would have had another attempt to rund down some more clock and another shot at the field goal.

Now I will say this, I believe Witten had the first down, and I believe Romo got the first down again on his run for the end zone.

Now, I blame Parcells for not asking his guys in the box to ask for a review of the Witten catch and spot.

I don't even think the Seahawks players would Agree with you.

It took a MONUMENTAL BREAKDOWN on our parts for them to win.

Anyone with 2 eyes knows that.

Regardless of what you think the gameplan was good enough for us to advance to the 2nd round of the playoffs.

Players just screwed it up.
 
CATCH17;1316007 said:
I don't even think the Seahawks players would Agree with you.

It took a MONUMENTAL BREAKDOWN on our parts for them to win.

Anyone with 2 eyes knows that.

Regardless of what you think the gameplan was good enough for us to advance to the 2nd round of the playoffs.

Players just screwed it up.

LOL, that was good, I got a good laugh, I know you watched the Eagles and Saints, the Ravens and Colts, the chargers and patriots and the bears and hawks play in the seocnd round of the playoffs this past weeked, just like I did, not once did I see the Dallas Cowboys trot out on a football field.

So that tells me our gameplan was not good enough to get us past the first round, I mean that was a hint and a half for your a--.

Come on now Quincy.

How bout the coaches screwed it up,(gameplan) and that the Seahawks players did not and will not say anything that you just tried to make it seem that they would say.

They talked about seizing the moment, and destiny, when interviewed about the game with the Cowboys, they were confident that even if we had made the field goal that they were still going to come out on top with a last minute drive down the field and win.
 
BHendri5;1316021 said:
LOL, that was good, I got a good laugh, I know you watched the Eagles and Saints, the Ravens and Colts, the chargers and patriots and the bears and hawks play in the seocnd round of the playoffs this past weeked, just like I did, not once did I see the Dallas Cowboys trot out on a football field.

So that tells me our gameplan was not good enough to get us past the first round, I mean that was a hint and a half for your a--.

Come on now Quincy.

How bout the coaches screwed it up,(gameplan) and that the Seahawks players did not and will not say anything that you just tried to make it seem that they would say.

They talked about seizing the moment, and destiny, when interviewed about the game with the Cowboys, they were confident that even if we had made the field goal that they were still going to come out on top with a last minute drive down the field and win.


You must've turned the game off in the middle of the 4th Quarter.

If you would've kept watching you would've saw that our defense made a goal line stand and the only thing that could've stopped us from a win is well... a Breakdown.

Terry Glenn then fumbled and they got a safety, they got up 21 20 and ROMO fumbled the snap.

The game plan was enough for us to win. Watch the game... Its clear as day.... It could've been better.... but it was enough to get us to the 2nd round.... Chicago tested that same secondary all day and it took them taking the game into overtime to win it....

We gave them that game... DUUUUUUUUUUH
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,268
Messages
13,862,617
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top