Good point, gfunk. They do have a new O-line coach, and one with pretty good credentials at that, so maybe they are improved for that reason.Gfunk said:I was really surprised too
ya'll did play very physical and violent at the LOS, so you can't take that away from the team
but that JAX o-line has been having protection problems for years, maybe Mike Tice has really done some genuine coaching
DipChit said:Well for those that think the game is won in the trenches it could just be that our guys aint good enough. Oh you can talk scheme all you want. But the bottomline is you're gonna have pass rushers that need to simply beat the man in front of them. Same with your O-linemen.
Yeah blitzing is all well and good and as other have pointed out, the whole purpose of that is to create a scenario where the blitzer doesnt have to beat anyone because he goes unblocked. That indeed as been an issue for years. When we finally do blitz it's almost like the blitzer purposely looks for a dood to engage with.
But cant we ever beat someone 1 on 1 from a base package with any regularity? Apparently not.
DipChit said:Well for those that think the game is won in the trenches it could just be that our guys aint good enough. Oh you can talk scheme all you want. But the bottomline is you're gonna have pass rushers that need to simply beat the man in front of them. Same with your O-linemen.
Yeah blitzing is all well and good and as other have pointed out, the whole purpose of that is to create a scenario where the blitzer doesnt have to beat anyone because he goes unblocked. That indeed as been an issue for years. When we finally do blitz it's almost like the blitzer purposely looks for a dood to engage with.
But cant we ever beat someone 1 on 1 from a base package with any regularity? Apparently not.
Cogan said:That is why their running game was so effective. It all starts with our NT, who seemed to find his game this preseason. Ferguson was getting shoved all around, and wasn't getting help by his linemates. If he is getting doubled all game long, then somebody has to be open to make the play. I lost count of all the missed or broken tackles by our LBs & DBs.
When their running game is so effective, it makes our pass rush much less effective. Their trenches kicked our trenches a**.
MichaelWinicki said:I've thought right along that our pass rush was going to be a big time problem this year.
While some may not consider Glover a major missing part but the guy was arguably our second or third best pass rusher--- and none of the starters have filled the void.
Neither Canty or Spears were big-time pass rushers in college and I doubt they will be in the pros-- neither has that "burst" needed to be a good pass rusher.
Ferguson may press the pocket a little but he isn't a "Glover" when it comes to rushing the passer.
Our pass rush on the early downs was just horrid... absolutely horrid.
We only had 37 sacks last year... I doubt we get that many this year.
Clove said:After rewatching the game last night, I noticed that Ware didn't rush the passer as much as I thought he should have. Secondly, we rarely blitzed, and I can't understand why.
It seems like Pittsburgh and San Diego blitz like every other play.
ANd thrid, I think that Hatcher needs more playing time on the opposite side of Ware in Nickel situations, honestly.
RCowboyFan said:As I suspected that people will blame Zimmer, but it seems like blame should be based Squarely on BP. He said in pre-season that Zimmer was thinking up some Exotic stuff and BP asked Zimmer to simmer down since he thought the players weren't ready for it.
I mean no Blitz or they barely blitzed. And ineffective Blitz when they did, probaly two times they did it. I don't know, for me, more than Bledsoe and Offense, Defense is the one that gave me a bad feeling about this season. We shall see I guess.
Cbz40 said:I put all the blame on the coaching......With the talent we have are you telling me they cannot come w/at least two or three blitz packages that can get to the QB.??????????
Campo could....every D coach in the NFL can. Zimmer did in Parcells first year. I ask you Why can't we now?
gbrittain said:Tell me about it. I put most of the blame squarely on the shoulders of both BP and Zimmer. I have heard every excuse imaginable and they all suck.
Cbz40 said:I complained about this last season.....I was told by many...well we are in a new D, too many rookies on D. Well what's the excuse this year?
Cbz40 said:I complained about this last season.....I was told by many...well we are in a new D, too many rookies on D. Well what's the excuse this year?
Stautner said:Number 1: IT'S ONE GAME .....don't be a fair weather fan - wait and see how it plays out as the season progresses.
Number 2: Who are the proven pass rushers on this team? You seem to think we have Lawrence Taylor and Julius Peppers, when what we really have is an older veteran LB (Ellis) who has had moderate success as a pass rusher while playing another postion, and a 2nd year player (Ware) who has yet to establish himself as a consistent pass rushing presence.
Number 3: Roy and some of the LB's did blitz yesterday, it just didn't garner much results.
Number 4: If the players can't beat opponents one on one on any semi-consisent basis, an elaborate blitzing package ends up being a smoke and mirrors attempt to mask deficiencies.
BOTTOME LINE: Perhaps the coaches could have done more and made some calls that would have helped, but the players still have to go out and make plays - and that didn't happen. The biggest impact in the game is player execution, not game time coaching decisions.
superpunk said:He's Roy Williams. He blows guys like that up for breakfast. Yes, it was a great play by Drew, but Roy needed to make a better one.
gbrittain said:You just called CBZ a fair weather fan. Seriously, I know you mean well but you should be around here a little longer before you go and call people fair weather fans.