My criterion as options.
1. Must have legit cap space. Need 1 mega-max slot minimum to play.
2. Must have trade assets with picks or young players.
3. Must have good LeBron relationship.
4. Bonus points for being in the East.
5. Some political lean to left minimum.
That's actually part of it that makes it much easier.Probably Lakers due to some young talent there and cap space. Also, they are in LA.
Who is part of LBJ superfriends? Wade is looking like a depth player, with questionable effort, Melo hasn't been considered great in a while now. That leaves who, Chris Paul?
Love the Lakers, never liked Lebron. I would be ok with Lebron on the Lakers, but not at any cost via trading Ingram or Ball to get a player Lebron wants on the team with him in LA. I don't want the Lakers changing everything or anything to make Lebron happy. If that's what Lebron wants then he can go somewhere else.
Ball & Ingram are untouchable.
I think if Lebron goes to LA Ingram and Ball are traded. And if you are LA you have to ask yourself if its better to go with a short window with Lebron & Friends or keep building on your young core. Its also worth noting that LA is losing a potentially high lotto pick this year to Philadelphia or Boston so your young core may just be Ingram and Ball.This is why Lakers are not clear front runner. Magic can build around around Ingram and all which seems to be the plan or hand the franchise to LeBron but he can't do both. Noting else on the Lakers roster is much of an asset and they are tradeable firsts for a while.
That was a team that won 26 games so they have a long way to go to have a legit NBA roster. It looks 2 to 3 years away from playoff contention.
BUT... Magic could flip the script and go opposite direction with LeBron makeover and he'd need assets such as Ball/Ingram to make that happen imho.
I think the Lakers will have space for two max deals next season. They could probably clear space for a 3rd but I think they would have to give up assets to get someone to take Clarksons contract.This is why Lakers are not clear front runner. Magic can build around around Ingram and all which seems to be the plan or hand the franchise to LeBron but he can't do both. Noting else on the Lakers roster is much of an asset and they are tradeable firsts for a while.
That was a team that won 26 games so they have a long way to go to have a legit NBA roster. It looks 2 to 3 years away from playoff contention.
BUT... Magic could flip the script and go opposite direction with LeBron makeover and he'd need assets such as Ball/Ingram to make that happen imho.
Arent all 4 in question going to be undrafted free agents? If so do the lakers really need to trade anyone?
Deng is trash. I am sure they can trade clarkson, he is a good player.They would have to dump Clarkson and Deng to even worry about Bron and company. Maybe they can try to find someone dumb enough to take those salaries.
Their not trading Ball, he is supposed to be the franchise and he from LA. Ingram is terrible, look up the numbers they will tell you that. HOF talent that is Embiid is in Philly, Bron's not stupid, he might go to the Lakers cause its LA but if he actually uses his brain he would stay in Cleveland or go to Philly where he could get alot of rings there if Embiid is healthy.