PJTHEDOORS
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,190
- Reaction score
- 18,582
Not sure what exactly we are even debating at this point.
The Lakers were a 26 win team. They've added a great prospect in Lonzo Ball but he's a kid who can't shoot it all that well.
No that team doesnt match up to CLE 2016. If you disagree I seriously question if you've bothered looking at the rosters.
CLE had legit veteran players like Deron Williams and Richard Jefferson as bench scrubs. They were shallow but shallow with vets.
The Lakers lack proven NBA players.
And right now only Ingram and Ball have the type of cache around the league to warrant much of anything in trade.
LBJ is not playing with those guys man. He's just not. So if he goes to the Lakers that roster would have to be overhauled same way it was in CLE.
Julius Randle played his HS ball 5 minutes from me and I am familiar with his trainer/coach JWebster and that AAU program Texas Titans/Nike Pro Skills Elite. I truly hope he achieves greatness but his trade value right now is a low first or 2nd round pick. He's a 6'7" lefty power forward that has limited shooting range.
I said Lebron with PGeorge added wtih the talent the Lakers have (which I pointed out). Cleveland 2016 had basically no bench. You disagree, I seriously question if you've bothered looking at the rosters. So because Cleveland had old bench scrubs, they get a pass because they are vets?
So YOU know who Lebron is playing with? lol. His WIFE wants to live in LA full time. People that are close to him say he wants to live in LA full time to persue his entertainment media stuff in the offseason. Randle's value is a low 2nd round pick? LOL! You obviously don't folllow the Lakers. Randle this offseason, transformed his body and looks like an adonis, he has worked endlessly on his outside shot, and his own trainer has seen the improvement, been on radio/social media talking about how much his game has improved. I'm guessing you are either a Spurs/Dallas/Boston fan that hates the Lakers and doesn't want to see Lebron on there.
Last edited: