Which Head Coach that is available is better than Garrett right now?

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
offended? why offended? angry? why be angry?

young kids do and say what they do....in time they will grow up, learn ....its called experience.

when you go based on your perceptions you will be wrong most often than not...use facts and you will succeed.

you are obviously idealist....that goes with being young, and then comes experience.....

I am glad you showed some willingness to learn, given many would have resisted.

The only thing you have taught me is your a defensive little man with anger issues. :lmao2::lmao:
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Yes you are, your claim he was sabotaged by Garrett is definitely ignoring his own fault and failing for getting fired...lol

There is evidence of the sabotage. It was in his best interest. Wade had faults for sure, however.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,540
Reaction score
19,286
The only thing you have taught me is your a defensive little man with anger issues. :lmao2::lmao:
the young generation..

again what anger? seems like you like to play fantasy and make up stuff...which explains a lot
. you have no substance to respond accodingly, so instead you have taken the low road...which shows your character...


good luck kiddo
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
So it was injuries and coaching and not the team? We agree. The team was good enough.

That is the team, are you lost, the team was 1-7, it was a bad team up until JG took over...lol so yes we agree it was a bad team
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
There is evidence of the sabotage. It was in his best interest. Wade had faults for sure, however.

Lol.....you live in a fantasy world there was no evidence of any sabotage...how stupid can people be to believe some crap...lol
 

Skillit

Well-Known Member
Messages
433
Reaction score
351
there was so much BS and made up stories in that, that I don't know where to begin....

during garrett's time as coordinator, our run pass ratio was about 40/60....run pass ratio on first downs about 60/40......

the play by plays are there for you to see on NFL.com..the run pass ratio for each year....
2007 - run/pass 42%/58% ----
2008 - run/pass 42%/58%-----
2009 run/pass 43%/57%
2010 run/pass 41%/59% ---
2011 run/pass 40%/60%
2012 run/pass 31%/69% ----
2013 run/pass 38%/62%
2014 run/pass 50%/50% --- the year DeMarco almost ran for 2000.......
2015 run/pass 42%/58%

the 40/60 ratio is about league average and in fact the better passing teams have a higher percentage of making the playoffs than better rushing teams.....
all there for you to see for yourself, but given it won't fit your agenda and perception, you will choose to ignore


so this notion of all good teams ran the ball is total BS....if you go back over the past 10 years, most of the playoff teams are from teams that have successful passing games and good rushing teams have a lower percentage of making the playoffs....


Lol, you kind of proved my point.

Or it’s just an Indictment of Romo.

Either way- I’m assuming you watched the games. Mostly I’m describing Garrett’s first 3-5 seasons. The play calling and audible sequences (out of runs) were predictable to the point of absurdity.

Of course not every single successful tram has to a have balanced attack, but it certainly helps in general and is ESSENTIAL FOR THIS TEAM the way it’s currently constructed.

Also, every single year over the past decade, in the last few games of the regular season and/or bad weather playoff games, you see teams that can’t run exposed because they don’t have a QB named Brady, Roethlisburger, Brees, Rogers or Manning.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,540
Reaction score
19,286
Lol, you kind of proved my point.

Or it’s just an Indictment of Romo.

Either way- I’m assuming you watched the games. Mostly I’m describing Garrett’s first 3-5 seasons. The play calling and audible sequences (out of runs) were predictable to the point of absurdity.

Of course not every single successful tram has to a have balanced attack, but it certainly helps in general and is ESSENTIAL FOR THIS TEAM the way it’s currently constructed.

Also, every single year over the past decade, in the last few games of the regular season and/or bad weather playoff games, you see teams that can’t run exposed because they don’t have a QB named Brady, Roethlisburger, Brees, Rogers or Manning.
wait..... you said I proved your point? how....I showed that we are a relatively balanced offense compared to the rest of the league.

initially you said garrett predictable offense...now you say indictment of romo....which is it? romo? or garrett?

romo, did audible out of a lot of runs....he was pass happy....
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,540
Reaction score
19,286
Semantics. You’re building a case to paint him in a positive light. Whatever your intent it’s poor execution. Sorry
no, that's your interpretation..... you want him to be very negative and he is not....thus you say semantics.....
 

Proof

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,738
Reaction score
14,342
no, that's your interpretation..... you want him to be very negative and he is not....thus you say semantics.....

I don’t want him to be anything, I’m not the arbiter. Definitely not an interpretation either, it’s fairky straight forward.
 

Captain-Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,542
Reaction score
33,804
Romo could read the defenses, something Dak and Garrett can't do. '"pass happy" lmao..
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,481
Reaction score
67,294
Late to the party and I am not going to wade through the pages.

I just want to say, I like the caveat. "Available".

It reminds me of the old days when people would complain that Quincy Carter was horrible and fanboys would reply, well, who else would you like that is available?

Well, the Spagnola Principle is undefeated. If they were so good, why are they available?

Anyone that defends Garrett can only bring up their imaginary intangibles to defend it.

Like how he gets plucky teams to somehow scratch, bite and claw their way through adversity.

That is kind of cool if you are talking about a coach who is now the 7th most tenured in the entire NFL.

Only he and Marvin Lewis have the special distinction of zero Super Bowls to get them that privilege.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Give me a list of the Top 20 coaches available, and I'll give you a list of 20 coaches better than Garrett.

21!
150426-spevack-animal-rights-tease_pm6qo6
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
the young generation..

again what anger? seems like you like to play fantasy and make up stuff...which explains a lot
. you have no substance to respond accodingly, so instead you have taken the low road...which shows your character...


good luck kiddo
Lol....sure thing kiddo!!
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
That is the team, are you lost, the team was 1-7, it was a bad team up until JG took over...lol so yes we agree it was a bad team

So how did a bad team go 5-3? Your logic doesn’t add up.
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
Romo could read the defenses, something Dak and Garrett can't do. '"pass happy" lmao..


How many times dis changing the play result in Ints? How many times have fans complained about a negative play when they thought it should’ve been a run, only to find out later that Romo changed it at the line to a pass? The end of the Green Bay and Denver game comes to mind a couple years back. But that’s all irrelevant, because all Qbs job is to audible and get the offense into the right play because at the time the OC give you the play the defense isn’t set and the speaker goes out in seconds. It amazes me how some fans try to argue a point when they have no clue. Do you think Brady and Manning or any other Qb ,always run the initial play into the huddle...lol
 

Dre11

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,686
Reaction score
11,450
So how did a bad team go 5-3? Your logic doesn’t add up.

There’s only 3 ways to look at this, either you’re dense or just want to go in circles, or you truly don’t understand team sports. I’m not going to tell you what I think. But for the last time , they didn’t go 5-3, they went 6-10(also a bad team) but to break it down for you for the 50th time, at 1-7 they were bad I don’t care how they got there, they were bad, any football person will tell you that, then they got new leadership,fresh ideas, and fear. They rode that to 5-3, but in the end ultimately ended at 6-10 and no playoffs. That’s bad.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
39,609
Reaction score
36,709
I dont want to start another bash garret or who's going to be the next Head coach...

but I was thinking about this today, who's available and who's better than him right now at where he's at... I know he's been learning on the job.... most people do in this day and age, but looking at College coaches they have to learn Pro game... looking at coordinators they have to learn how to be a head coach. looking at Retreads, they have to learn how the game is played today...

so my question is simple Who could replace him & be better than him right now where he's at today with this franchise.

I posted a thread a while back that showed that most Super Bowl coaches (almost all of them) win a Super Bowl within five years of becoming head coach. In the modern age of the salary cap, I believe (if I remember correctly) that all of Super Bowl-winning coaches had been their teams' head coach for five years or less.

So, I don't know who could replace him and do better, but the evidence shows that the next Super Bowl-winning coach of the Dallas Cowboys is not their current coach.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I posted a thread a while back that showed that most Super Bowl coaches (almost all of them) win a Super Bowl within five years of becoming head coach. In the modern age of the salary cap, I believe (if I remember correctly) that all of Super Bowl-winning coaches had been their teams' head coach for five years or less.

So, I don't know who could replace him and do better, but the evidence shows that the next Super Bowl-winning coach of the Dallas Cowboys is not their current coach.

The fact that coaches don’t often get long tenures without winning a Superbowl earlier in their careers isn’t actually evidence that it’s harder to do so later in your tenure. The hurdle is getting the runway in the first place.
 
Top