Which Head Coach that is available is better than Garrett right now?

[Diehardblues]

What help does Dak need? You still havent answered the question. Its obvious why.

He needs more help than Romo. That’s a concern with our front office and coaching staff.

That doesn’t mean they’re horrible just not enough to overcome less than elite talent .

 

[CowboyRoy]

So, you’d rather have Dak than a more elite QB?
Please explain ...

I would rather have Wentz without the injury. For the next 10 years there are few QB's i would rather have. But Dak might be the best of all of them.

 

[Ranching]

COY validated his ability to coach . A 13-3 and 12-4 season provides he can put together a contender despite not going deeper in playoffs.

Garrett’s going to be around long enough to have more success proving the naysayers wrong. It’s certainly help him with a more elite QB.

Coaches make elite QBs. Garrett wasted Romo and he would waste Brady.

 

[CowboyRoy]

He needs more help than Romo. That’s a concern with our front office and coaching staff.

They dont seem too concerned to me. LOL

Why have you all of a sudden changed from Zeke to Romo? Wiggling out of the hole again I see.

So what did Romo ever do without a great run game and Oline?

Romo won one playoff game.........................diddly.

 

[Diehardblues]

Coaches make elite QBs. Garrett wasted Romo and he would waste Brady.

Elite QB’s make coaches .

Coaches are reduced to average without elite talent .

A coaches greatest asset at this level is an eye for talent to fit his scheme.

 

[Diehardblues]

They dont seem too concerned to me. LOL

Why have you all of a sudden changed from Zeke to Romo? Wiggling out of the whole again I see.

So what did Romo ever do without a great run game and Oline?

Romo won one playoff game.........................diddly.

Exactly . He wasn’t enough either which is my point.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Coaches make elite QBs. Garrett wasted Romo and he would waste Brady.

This guy doesnt get that point. Brady wouldnt win any SB's had he been here and Romo in NE. And Romo probably wins at least a few.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Elite QB’s make coaches .

Coaches are reduced to average without elite talent .

A coaches greatest asset at this level is an eye for talent to fit his scheme.

All the reasons why Garrett is terrible.

 

[Jake]

So, you’d rather have Dak than a more elite QB?
Please explain ...

Dak is light years ahead of Romo after two seasons. Tony hadn't even taken a snap yet.

 

[Diehardblues]

This guy doesnt get that point. Brady wouldnt win any SB's had he been here and Romo in NE. And Romo probably wins at least a few.

But he might have taken us deeper like a championship appearance .

 

[Diehardblues]

All the reasons why Garrett is terrible.

Terrible and not enough or average is not the same thing.

 

[Diehardblues]

All the reasons why Garrett is terrible.

Garrett is average to above average as his record indicates.

He’s better when he has more talent.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Exactly . He wasn’t enough either which is my point.

So get rid of Romo and Dak because Garrett and Jerry are horrid? LOL

I guess that seems logical to you.

 

[CowboyRoy]

But he might have taken us deeper like a championship appearance .

And you might wake up from your dream.

mommy.........mommy, I want Tom Brady!!!!!!

 

[Diehardblues]

Dak is light years ahead of Romo after two seasons. Tony hadn't even taken a snap yet.

That wasn’t my question ..

I was a Romo critic too.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Dak is light years ahead of Romo after two seasons. Tony hadn't even taken a snap yet.

A little sore they are.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Terrible and not enough or average is not the same thing.

Its the same to me.

 

[Diehardblues]

And you might wake up from your dream.

mommy.........mommy, I want Tom Brady!!!!!!

I’d take Rodgers, Brees and Peyton too. How about Wentz or Goff now.

Why wouldn’t we think we might have a little more success with a more elite QB?

 

[Diehardblues]

Its the same to me.

Lol.. I rest my case

 

[CowboyRoy]

Garrett is average to above average as his record indicates.

He’s better when he has more talent.

You took good logic and made the wrong analysis out of it:

If Garrett is only as good as his talent then what good is he? So when Garrett's teams go 13 o 12 wins its because of the talent he has and not his coaching ability. Any fool can win with good talent. When a few of those pieces get hurt, he bombs.