JackMagist
The Great Communicator
- Messages
- 5,726
- Reaction score
- 0
You said "ANYONE" but a FS. My first pick was for an OLB but only because I think there is better value at that position. I sure don't want to reach for an OL at #18 and any OL that drops that far will be a reach in the first round. And we pretty well bloistered our DL in last years draft and FA. So the trenches are covered as far as the 1st round goes IMO unless Nagata drops to us. He is the only guy in the trenches that I would take in the first. So why not FS if the value is there? It is a position of need whereas some of the other positions would be for depth or insurance such as WR. Using your arguement we shouldn't go OLB because we used a 1st last year on an OLB...makes no sense to me.JustSayNotoTO said:You do know the game is won or lost in the trenches? What playoff teams last year had 3 #1 picks in their secondary? It is overkill. Especially with a gaping hole at OLB that I dont really expect Singleton to fill.