kartr
New Member
- Messages
- 3,039
- Reaction score
- 0
blindzebra said:It better be Henson or we will be in big trouble long term.
Not really. Henson is so far behind in experience at the college and pro level compared to 1st,2nd year players,plus collegians that will have played two to three years, that just about any qb we draft in 2006 will have played more football than he has and will have a better feel for the game. The only thing that Henson has on Romo is size and arm strength, but Romo has played much more football and thus has a better feel for playing the position. That's why I didn't like the Henson signing, he's relearning football. It would have been much more cost effective to draft a qb in 2005 or 2006 for that matter. If we do draft a qb in 2006, that player will have had at least 24 starts recently, compared to Hensons' eight, 5-6 years ago. Such a rookie would be ready to start in 2007, while Henson, who knows.