ajk23az;3049910 said:We won by 21 vs. Seattle. How can you say that w/o Miles today, we would have lost?
newnationcb;3049897 said:1. Romo has thrown 4 ints this season in 2 games. In the Giants game, one of them was intended for Crayton that got returned for a TD, one of them bounced of Witten's foot and the 3rd was intended for Hurd. In the Denver game, the int was intended for Austin. Roy actually broke up an int by Aqib Talib on a low ball that was intended for him in the Tampa game. So, no! You're off on this one.
2. It's definitely a cause for concern at this point. Or at least should become a focal point in their preparation. But even you, and the staunches of the Roy haters, can agree that he's getting open out there and has a skill set that poses a legit threat for any defense. They just have to get on the same page. They are taking the next step in conversing about plays on the sideline for lengths of time after the plays-and Wade even alluded to this in his post game PC.
But it's not something that easy to explain. It's easy and actually a cop out for those who don't like Roy to say he's lazy, he's a bum, not worth the contract etc. But it's gotta be a combination of things and I truly believe they'll get on the same page soon.
I was willing to make a bet with Bob prior to this game that Roy got more than 5 catches. Glad I didn't. Or actually, glad he wasn't willing
Bleu Star;3049954 said:Coming from you, I believe this is probably the most civil post ever aimed in my direction.
In those first couple of game Tony wasn't settled into a groove and he was consistently looking off his alleged #1 WR. That created instances where the ball was being thrown with a greater sense of urgency since he was already checking to his 2nd and 3rd reads (b/c lazy #1 wasn't doing anything to help the cause). So, regarding #1, I don't think I am off at all. Actually, I am pretty spot on. Tony's #1 read is now open more often than not. He is now making more cool, calm, and deliberate throws as a result of that new #1.
Yep. Good thing you didn't take that bet.
Bob Sacamano;3049905 said:you callin' me yellah?
Bleu Star;3049827 said:Mine:
Joe Decamilis - STUD coach
Miles Austin - Clear #1...
I sure wish Austin had stepped his game up before we went out and mortgaged the house on the forgettable RW11. Perhaps someone can answer a couple of burning questions.
1. Am I the only one that notices the parallel between Romo no longer making RW11 the primary target and his INTs going completely away?
2. Can someone explain to me how two people that allegedly worked so hard together in the off-season are rarely on the same page? Romo is playing at a very high level so I know it's not on him. Hrmmm...
dallascowboyfanboy;3049977 said:Wade Phillips and Jason Garrett. Without their leadership and coaching abilities we wouldnt be where we are today. Gotta give em some love.
fanfromvirginia;3049991 said:I'll go with Romo and Austin. Ratliff, Brooking and DeCamillis are all deserving as well but Bleu said to pick two and I just don't see how you keep either one of those guys off the list.
Bleu Star;3049986 said:I still have a difficult time giving Wade any love. Garrett, I find it easier to give him some. He is on a good positive path right now.
Bleu Star;3049954 said:Coming from you, I believe this is probably the most civil post ever aimed in my direction.
In those first couple of game Tony wasn't settled into a groove and he was consistently looking off his alleged #1 WR. That created instances where the ball was being thrown with a greater sense of urgency since he was already checking to his 2nd and 3rd reads (b/c lazy #1 wasn't doing anything to help the cause). So, regarding #1, I don't think I am off at all. Actually, I am pretty spot on. Tony's #1 read is now open more often than not. He is now making more cool, calm, and deliberate throws as a result of that new #1.
Yep. Good thing you didn't take that bet.