YoMick;2821951 said:
"irreplaceable" PLAYER
not "irreplaceable" UNIT.
Point taken.
Mick's a big Emmitt fan (and that is fine), but no one has yet to engage the evidence that I presented that 1993 was way overblown. Everyone wants to talk about the 2 games, (yea TWO WHOLE GAMES) that Smith missed that year, and conveniently forget the two games in 1990 we lost, after a 5 game winning streak, when Aikman went down. Emmitt was still there, but we lost. What happened?
People so over simplify these arguments. I'll say again. Who is the backup? Did they ever do anything before or after?
The reason why Dallas consistently put more expensive backups in place with Aikman (with the exception of Garrett), and stiffs behind Emmitt (until Chris Warren), was two fold.
1. Emmitt's durabilty
2. The value of the QB position - period.