- Messages
- 33,773
- Reaction score
- 31,541
THUMPER;2820800 said:Did I miss the point of this thread?
I thought it was the guy we have never replaced (or not completely), not who was most valuable to the team at the time they played, and therefore irreplaceable.
Which is it?
I hear ya Thumpster, I don't think some realize what irreplaceable means. Staubach was nicely 'replaced', ultimately by Aikman, etc. A good argument can be made that Darren Woodsen is and has been, the most irreplaceable.