Who is willing to accept 40 turnovers by the QB this year?

JBond

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,028
Reaction score
3,491
7 ints, 3 fumbles over four games = 40 screw ups by our QB this year. Could Romo be any worse? Bledsoe usually has been strong early and faded late. What is the problem this year? Maybe our WR's are horrible no talent bums. Maybe our TE's do not understand the game. Maybe JJ and MBIII are clowns.

What do you think?
 

Cochese

Benched
Messages
7,360
Reaction score
0
I allready have. We have a mediocre, at best QB who is past his prime.

Did you know that Charlie Frye and 25 other QB's have better ratings than deadslow?
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,150
Reaction score
27,236
JBond;1084683 said:
7 ints, 3 fumbles over four games = 40 screw ups by our QB this year. Could Romo be any worse? Bledsoe usually has been strong early and faded late. What is the problem this year? Maybe our WR's are horrible no talent bums. Maybe our TE's do not understand the game. Maybe JJ and MBIII are clowns.

What do you think?

Beast is pretty sure what the problem is and Beast would fix it tommorow by naming Romo the starter.

I cant believe we are on pace for 40 turnovers by the QB and Tuna says nothing is wrong with his Boy.............freaking amazing:mad:
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
At some point, Bledsoe is going to have to connect 2 to 3 games including a great game against a great opponent together, or even the stubborn Bill will have to make a move.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
JBond;1084683 said:
7 ints, 3 fumbles over four games = 40 ***** ups by our QB this year.

Bledsoe hasn't lost three fumbles, he has lost one. And when you recover the fumble, it's not a turnover. So he's on pace for 32 turnovers, not 40.
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
Just looked in the paper this morning it who is at the bottom of the QB ratings, but our boy Drew. 63% Nicve start to the season!
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
JBond;1084683 said:
7 ints, 3 fumbles over four games = 40 screw ups by our QB this year. Could Romo be any worse? Bledsoe usually has been strong early and faded late. What is the problem this year? Maybe our WR's are horrible no talent bums. Maybe our TE's do not understand the game. Maybe JJ and MBIII are clowns.

What do you think?

Wow! I did not realize that but you are right........awesome stat and I hate it! This cannot continue......:bang2:
 
Messages
754
Reaction score
7
I think Purcells is too stubborn to replace his boy Bledslow this year no matter what happens.

He'll give us the old, "he gives us the best chance to win" BS again like he did with that relic Testeverde.

9-7 here we come again!! :(
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
AdamJT13;1084723 said:
Bledsoe hasn't lost three fumbles, he has lost one. And when you recover the fumble, it's not a turnover. So he's on pace for 32 turnovers, not 40.

Thats relieving. Bah.
 

kartr

New Member
Messages
3,039
Reaction score
0
JustSayNotoTO;1084685 said:
I allready have. We have a mediocre, at best QB who is past his prime.

Did you know that Charlie Frye and 25 other QB's have better ratings than deadslow?

Be nice now, Bledsoe is the best qb we've had since Aikman, or so I'm told.
:laugh2:
 

kartr

New Member
Messages
3,039
Reaction score
0
AdamJT13;1084723 said:
Bledsoe hasn't lost three fumbles, he has lost one. And when you recover the fumble, it's not a turnover. So he's on pace for 32 turnovers, not 40.

That makes us feel a lot better.
:laugh2:
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Yeah.

Cincy should probably replace Palmer, too. After all, he's on pace for 32 turnovers as well. Looks like "throw in the towel" time.

I think it's Anthony Wright time!

w00t!!!!!!eleventy-one!111!!

He's also been sacked 5 more times than Bledsoe, too. In fact, 14 more QBs have been sacked MORE than Bledsoe, including such elusive studs as McNabb, Vick, Losman, and Frye! I think, actually, that their stud offensive lines include several players the great Oline draft gurus on this site were clamoring for during the draft! How can this be?
 

kartr

New Member
Messages
3,039
Reaction score
0
alancdc;1084755 said:
Just looked in the paper this morning it who is at the bottom of the QB ratings, but our boy Drew. 63% Nicve start to the season!

Funny, wasn't that QC's qb rating when he was a rookie.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,655
Reaction score
43,001
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
superpunk;1085006 said:
Yeah.

Cincy should probably replace Palmer, too. After all, he's on pace for 32 turnovers as well. Looks like "throw in the towel" time.

I think it's Anthony Wright time!

w00t!!!!!!eleventy-one!111!!

He's also been sacked 5 more times than Bledsoe, too. In fact, 14 more QBs have been sacked MORE than Bledsoe, including such elusive studs as McNabb, Vick, Losman, and Frye! I think, actually, that their stud offensive lines include several players the great Oline draft gurus on this site were clamoring for during the draft! How can this be?

:laugh2: :laugh2:
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,655
Reaction score
43,001
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
kartr;1085007 said:
Funny, wasn't that QC's qb rating when he was a rookie.

Funny...QC is also an out of work QB with drug problems.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
JBond;1084683 said:
7 ints, 3 fumbles over four games = 40 screw ups by our QB this year. Could Romo be any worse? Bledsoe usually has been strong early and faded late. What is the problem this year? Maybe our WR's are horrible no talent bums. Maybe our TE's do not understand the game. Maybe JJ and MBIII are clowns.

What do you think?

I think this is just another get rid of Bledsoe post and lets see the new toy and if that does not bear fruit right away will bash him as well. This crud has gotten old quickly. Thank God this team does not make decisions based on what fans think.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
AdamJT13;1084723 said:
Bledsoe hasn't lost three fumbles, he has lost one. And when you recover the fumble, it's not a turnover. So he's on pace for 32 turnovers, not 40.

Bledsoe has averaged 19.46 Turn Overs for his career. Over the past three seasons (not including this one), he has averaged 22.66 TOs. I would be very surprised if he committed 32 this year but I fully expect him to be in the ball park with 20+. In his career, he holds a +/- TD vs TO ratio of -1 over 13 complete seasons. That's really a horrible statistic IMO but there are examples of QBs who are in the ball park. Looking at QBs with a good 9 to 10 seasons in the league, Plummer has averaged 20 TOs a year over 9 complete seasons. He has a +/- TO ratio of -15 over his 9 Seasons. Favre has averaged 20.86 over 15 complete seasons. His +/- ratio is +95. There are other's who have been in the league over 9 or 10 years I did not list simply because they are not in the same league as far as TOs go. Manning is just shy with 8 seasons and he could be considered but he too has an overwhelming + margin in TD/TO ratio it's rediculous.

Bledsoe has never been and will never be great in this area, IMO. He is not as bad as Plummer but he is not as good as Favre either. This is what can be expected from Bledsoe IMO.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
JBond;1084683 said:
7 ints, 3 fumbles over four games = 40 screw ups by our QB this year. Could Romo be any worse? Bledsoe usually has been strong early and faded late. What is the problem this year? Maybe our WR's are horrible no talent bums. Maybe our TE's do not understand the game. Maybe JJ and MBIII are clowns.

What do you think?
Can you absolutely guarantee those 40 turnovers? Or are you just extrapolating for the sake of hyperbole?
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
Hostile;1085069 said:
Can you absolutely guarantee those 40 turnovers? Or are you just extrapolating for the sake of hyperbole?
funny how saying JJ's on pace for 1600 yards is OK though.
 
Top