NorthwestDallas40
rpatricc
- Messages
- 6,246
- Reaction score
- 9,276
For the lack of recent big free agent acquisitions, how is it that we still have no money to spend in free agency? Is it just the Romo, T smith, and Dez contracts? Anyone know?
Based on current numbers, without restructured, we are right up against the cap. Whereas many other teams are wrll under it. While I know we can restructure and release, I still consider it salary cap hell because we cannot make a big signing without a lot of machinations.
Based on current numbers, without restructured, we are right up against the cap. Whereas many other teams are wrll under it. While I know we can restructure and release, I still consider it salary cap hell because we cannot make a big signing without a lot of machinations.
The Cowboys structure their contracts with the intent to restructure them. Various teams use various different methods, but any team with the cash to use this method are smart for doing so. When the Cowboys trigger the restructures they designed, how in the world is that cap hell? It's the method that they prefer and allows them to spend MORE than the cap year in and year out. It's a competitive advantage.
The team has decided to not be big spenders, as a general rule, in free agency. In the right situation they will pony up. For instance they gave Hardy 13m on a 1 year deal. Even then they were smart about the structure.Well, how is it advantaheous when the team indicates that they will not have the money to bring in a significant free agency upgrade? Not even one? That doesn't really add up, does it?
The skins have been in salary cap hell for 20 years and they still sign anyone they want