Why did you guys give up over 100 yards rushing the last two games?

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,838
Reaction score
112,748
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Sarcastro said:
They didn't really kick our butts. The score at the end of the game was I think 38-31 Colts. The difference was Priest fumbling after he had a 50+ yard run.
The difference was your D sucked big time. Indy didn't punt the whole day.
 

brokeback

Benched
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
271 rushing yards given up in back to back losses is greatness. You've convinced me.
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
Over the past two weeks, the Chicago Bears have allowed 207 yards rushing to the greatness that is the Green Bay, and Tampa Bay rushing attacks, including such surefire HOFers as Samkon Gado. Carolina in the last three weeks allowed two teams to get 120 yards rushing against them. it appears, they are not great.

Dallas also must qualify as not great, since they gave up a little over 200 yards in regulation to two of the best rushing teams in the league, holding each of them to below their average rushing output. They also held each offense well below their average scoring output, allowing Denver's offense to score 14 points, and 10 to the Giants. That's 11.8 and 16.6 ppg below those teams averages, respectively.
 

BigDFan5

Cowboys Make me Drink
Messages
15,109
Reaction score
546
superpunk said:
Over the past two weeks, the Chicago Bears have allowed 207 yards rushing to the greatness that is the Green Bay, and Tampa Bay rushing attacks, including such surefire HOFers as Samkon Gado. Carolina in the last three weeks allowed two teams to get 120 yards rushing against them. it appears, they are not great.

Dallas also must qualify as not great, since they gave up a little over 200 yards in regulation to two of the best rushing teams in the league, holding each of them to below their average rushing output. They also held each offense well below their average scoring output, allowing Denver's offense to score 14 points, and 10 to the Giants. That's 11.8 and 16.6 ppg below those teams averages, respectively.

Don't try to make sense to the troll super he is just looking for attention
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
GoChiefs said:
Was it the loss of Dat Nguyen? Or something else?

I will use the Seattle game as a measuring stick. We kept Sean Alexander in check for most of the game. I expect the same against the Chiefs and LJ.

LJ will get some but he aint getting 100+.

I guarantee it.
 

TunaFan33

Benched
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
0
FWIW-Dat Nguyen is considering retirement.

Whether or not his absense hurts our run D, this guy is THE anti-TO. His heart is 3 X's bigger than his size. Hopefully, he'll reconsider his pending retirement.
 
Top