Why do people act like Jason Garret is still the head coach?

Big_D said:
Weird thing around here. They’ll credit Quinn, Moore, McClay and even Jerry while the HC has nothing to do with it. I think it’s McCarthy more than any of them. There’s a quality plan in place that simply didn’t exist before he got here.
Click to expand...
Oh they'll credit MM when we lose a game no doubt. Some people always have to have a whipping boy. But I agree with you about a quality plan that didn't exist before McCarthy came. I also think it didn't show before because Kellen Moore was Jerry's pet cat so MM didn't exactly have a free hand to do as he wished.
 
mattjames2010 said:
I mean, we've got as far with Mike McCarthy as we did with Jason Garrett. Who cares how the season records have looked.
Plus, McCarthy is working with better talent.

I'm not a huge fan of Jason Garrett, but the first 5-6 years of his tenure here was rebuilding the defense after he finished with the offensive line.
Click to expand...
McCarthy is working with better talent because he helped bring that talent in. He's helping to shape this team into what it's becoming.
I'd take McCarthy's eye for talent ANY day to that of Garrett.
 
Last edited:
Big_D said:
Extremely different. Sure we’d like to be deeper in certain areas, but young guys are stepping up and playing well through adversity. That’s definitely one of the signs that things are not the same. It’s a big leap towards a much improved roster and all those improvements to the 53 are glaringly obvious when compared to the previous regime.
Click to expand...
Yup. I mean, this is not even close.
 
Buzzbait said:
McCarthy is working with better talent because he helped bring that talent in. He's helping to shape this team into what it's becoming.
I'd take McCarthy's eye for talent ANY day to that of Garrett.
Click to expand...
I doubt McCarthy has anything to do with the defensive picks...
 
Trajan said:
Jerry is still here. The assumption is that the coaches since Jimmy, excluding Parcells, were just weak yes men who basically were not true coaches and that Big Mike would just follow suit and be another weak HC like Garretop was.

McCarthy made some bad calls, such as pre-DC before Quinn, but I think he is a vast improvement over Garrett and has more control then it may appear, and definitely more than Garretop had.

The stomach does churn when I see Garrett on TV as an analyst, briefly, a pang of true fear erupts as the brain sees him as still our HC, then reality sets in and a deep relaxation takes hold. The decade under Garrett always seem a wasted time for Cowboys fans.
Click to expand...
Jerry has always been typecast as a meddler because he is outspoken and was in the dual role of owner and GM. Even Jimmy Johnson stated that Jerry was more of an irritation than a meddler because he would pitch ideas and be omni-present. From my perspective Jerry and Stephen basically holding the reins made a truly nearsighted and distracted tag team because of running so many other major business ventures. Jerry is just a figure head GM but because he is not shy speaking out to the media some think he is still micromanaging everything. Really at 80 years old? He can't even bend over to put his socks on let alone structure a long term team development plan.
 
cowboys5xsbs said:
This team isn't the 8-8 cowboys of old. I don't see a scenario where Dan Quinn and Micah have a let down game against Zach Wilson. You guys need to let the Garret era go he can't hurt you anymore.
Click to expand...
It's not the defense I'm worried about. The Cowboys offense has a reputation for getting punched in the mouth and falling down against good defenses. Specifically one player doesn't show up.
 
Buzzbait said:
McCarthy is working with better talent because he helped bring that talent in. He's helping to shape this team into what it's becoming.
I'd take McCarthy's eye for talent ANY day to that of Garrett.
Click to expand...
To be fair, based on the Lance trade, big Mike doesn’t get much of a say.

They totally ignored him on that trade.

It’s likely that way with all the trades/drafts/cuts/signings.

They just want him coaching. And now calling the plays on O.
 
cowboys5xsbs said:
This team isn't the 8-8 cowboys of old. I don't see a scenario where Dan Quinn and Micah have a let down game against Zach Wilson. You guys need to let the Garret era go he can't hurt you anymore.
Click to expand...
I haven’t read through this entire thread, so I am going to imagine that other poster are going to align with my thoughts. Do you not remember just last year?
 
Buzzbait said:
Oh they'll credit MM when we lose a game no doubt. Some people always have to have a whipping boy. But I agree with you about a quality plan that didn't exist before McCarthy came. I also think it didn't show before because Kellen Moore was Jerry's pet cat so MM didn't exactly have a free hand to do as he wished.
Click to expand...
I think we’ll get a better read on his play calling vs the Jets.

Is he just calling plays, or actually executing a game plan.

That Jets DC is for real.
 
At the very least, I'm thankful that we have a 'real' NFL coach in place and no longer have the Jerry Jones projects.

I like the tone of this team way better with Mike here.

Still, the defense looks more prepared than the offense, and we had one of the worst defenses in Cowboys history with Mike Nolan to a complete turn-around with Quinn.

If Mike can get consistency out of this offense, especially against tough defensive teams, I'll give him hisi props.
 
cowboys5xsbs said:
This team isn't the 8-8 cowboys of old. I don't see a scenario where Dan Quinn and Micah have a let down game against Zach Wilson. You guys need to let the Garret era go he can't hurt you anymore.
Click to expand...
Okay, Show us where the "Bad Redheaded Man" touched you, little Timmy.

giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 7,379 (members: 41, guests: 7,338)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,673
Messages
13,825,656
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top