I'm completely uninterested in the discussion that will follow.
Let me summarize how it will go. I will detail how historical patterns of discrimination limit opportunities leading to cycles of poverty.
You will shoot back with some Horatio Alger nonsense. Then you'll deny the existence of discrimination.
Then I'll likely get benched for my comments while your political statements are, for some reason, tolerated.
Yeah, not interested.
Of all homicides of black people, about 3% are by Police. For unarmed blacks killed by police it's less than 1% of the total homicides. The number gets down to 1/10th of 1% for unjustified/questionable police killings.
As mentioned about 3% of black homicides are by police. In contrast about 12% of non-black homicides are by police.
Tell me again why the focus is on unjustified police killings and not on murder rates of blacks not by the police?
If low income is the primary reason then why isn't the focus on that?
The number of unjustified or questionable police killings are below about 30 per year. Reducing the problem by 90% would save less than 30 people per year. Reducing the black murder rate by 50% would save about 4000 per per year.
Reducing poverty could help millions of people.
Kaepernick could choose a cause that would save thousands of lives per year or improve the lives of millions but instead is focused on saving less than 30. If you assume that all unjustified police killings of whites is just incompetence and apply that rate to the 30, then you get down under 10 unjustfied killings that might be due to race.
Even if race was magically eliminated as an issue with millions of police interactions with people each year there will always be some mistakes made.
Police are not highly paid. The best and brightest young people generally don't strive for low paying jobs where the death rate is much higher than most other jobs. There is always going to be mistakes made due to both emotion and incompetence.