Red Dragon
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,395
- Reaction score
- 3,773
Yes, I know - there was that debacle in February 2011 with the snow and the seats-scandal when Cowboys Stadium hosted Super Bowl XLV. But that mess isn't likely to happen again, and in the meantime, AT&T Stadium remains one of the biggest and finest venues in the NFL, and DFW is still usually warm in February.
The Texans', Saints,' Falcons, Dolphins, stadiums remain part of the "Super Bowl rotation." Nobody puts anywhere as much blame on the Saints and Superdome for that blackout in the Niners-Ravens Super Bowl as they do the Cowboys for freak weather and a stadium seating issue. Nobody blames the Dolphins for the rain that made a slippery mess of Super Bowl XLI. The Texans' stadium has hosted multiple Super Bowls and isn't as large as AT&T.
Is there any reason - other than anti-Cowboys or anti-Jerry prejudice - that the NFL would refuse to make AT&T Stadium part of its regular Super Bowl hosting rotation?
The Texans', Saints,' Falcons, Dolphins, stadiums remain part of the "Super Bowl rotation." Nobody puts anywhere as much blame on the Saints and Superdome for that blackout in the Niners-Ravens Super Bowl as they do the Cowboys for freak weather and a stadium seating issue. Nobody blames the Dolphins for the rain that made a slippery mess of Super Bowl XLI. The Texans' stadium has hosted multiple Super Bowls and isn't as large as AT&T.
Is there any reason - other than anti-Cowboys or anti-Jerry prejudice - that the NFL would refuse to make AT&T Stadium part of its regular Super Bowl hosting rotation?