Rampage
Benched
- Messages
- 24,117
- Reaction score
- 2
yeah cause Seinfeld was never funnybbgun;2797375 said:Seinfeld has nothing to worry about.
yeah cause Seinfeld was never funnybbgun;2797375 said:Seinfeld has nothing to worry about.
sureletsrace;2797441 said:BB,
I'm truly sorry that my sarcasm is not up to your standards. I awoke in pain and sweats thrice last night worrying about your approval of my post. Please forgive me.
Rampage;2797446 said:yeah cause Seinfeld was never funny
dcfanatic;2796857 said:Where's the article?
sureletsrace;2796854 said:Well everyone, I'm sorry to tell you guys this, but the '09 Cowboys are screwed.
#1 WR- Roy Williams - Lacks motivation. He doesn't "fight for the ball". Horrible @ running routes.
http://www.youtube.com/v/sbb7aSpB3XU&hl
********************************
#2 WR- Miles Austin - Not "proven". Green Bay doesn't count guys.
http://www.youtube.com/v/0x6O2u2n2LY&hl
********************************
#3 WR- Patrick Crayton - Slowest man on earth. Also has the worst hands.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pekJoqMICYM
********************************
I could go on forever. Don't even come to me about Jason Witten. With TO gone, he's going to be triple teamed. Even then, there will still somehow be enough players on the field to cover our god-awful WR's and sacking Romo and filling the non-existent gaps created by our horrid OL.
Same with Marty B. And Felix, Barber, and Choice.
Don't all of you understand? I saw a fact on NFL.com the other day that was interesting. No team has ever won a Super Bowl without TO, Brad Johnson, Greg Ellis, Chris Canty, and RW31(38?). Ever. EVER.
I don't see how we'll even get into field goal range.
"With the first pick in the 2010 Draft, the Dallas Cowboys select..."
Mark your calendars, you heard it here first.
jem88;2796991 said:God, there is nothing more annoying than people who respond to posts with the solitary 'fail'. It smacks of post-count padding and adds nothing to the conversation (cue the obvious 'fail' replies to this post.)
BrAinPaiNt;2796993 said:There is nothing more annoying than people who respond to posts complaining about posts with the solitary 'fail'. It smacks of post-count padding and adds nothing to the conversation (cue the obvious 'fail' replies to this post.)
Hostile;2797011 said:Why are people so hung up on post counts.
I just padded mine. Who the hell really cares?
superpunk;2797149 said:Fail.
Bleu Star;2797844 said:<--- more postcount padding in a wasteland of a thread.
bbgun;2797449 said:More sarcasm. More fail. Most respondents thought your post bombed, so no need to single me out.
sbuscha;2797823 said:How do these people find the internet?
jzcowboy;2797193 said:Why are they being recorded if they mean nothing? Why do us lurkers get bashed as our post meaning nothing because that number is small?
Touche! (further padding...)BrAinPaiNt;2796993 said:There is nothing more annoying than people who respond to posts complaining about posts with the solitary 'fail'. It smacks of post-count padding and adds nothing to the conversation (cue the obvious 'fail' replies to this post.)