wide recievers in draft
- Thread starter Henson7
- Start date
- Messages
- 101,823
- Reaction score
- 112,689
Hostile;2023905 said:
jobberone
Kane Ala
- Messages
- 54,219
- Reaction score
- 19,659
Doucett is a 1-2 WR likely first.
The WR class this year seems to be rather fluid in rankings. Last year there was C Johnson. This year there is no consensus number one. But that's a good thing for Big D. We have low first round picks. Having some people rank Hardy as a mid 2nd round pick is a good thing for us. We should be able to concentrate more on RB and then CB and then WR as that seems to be the depth of talent rotation for those positions. And you can very easily argue that.
In other words it's a deep draft for the skill positions this year. I wouldn't be surprised if we picked up a starting quality CB, RB and WR out of our first three picks.
The WR class this year seems to be rather fluid in rankings. Last year there was C Johnson. This year there is no consensus number one. But that's a good thing for Big D. We have low first round picks. Having some people rank Hardy as a mid 2nd round pick is a good thing for us. We should be able to concentrate more on RB and then CB and then WR as that seems to be the depth of talent rotation for those positions. And you can very easily argue that.
In other words it's a deep draft for the skill positions this year. I wouldn't be surprised if we picked up a starting quality CB, RB and WR out of our first three picks.
Henson7
Member
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 0
Glad to see I'm entertaining you guys..I picked the name awhile back..and I kinda like it ..it brings back memories of when we sucked. I checked out the link..I think everyplayer at every position is mentioned. Does anyone know if we like any reciever? I remember seeing Spencer's and Carpenter's name here last year a few weeks before the draft. Thanks for any info.
Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,834
- Reaction score
- 103,557
Hostile;2023939 said:Sweed appears to be the guy they might target, but in truth I think they are quite serious about trying to acquire a vet WR.
You don't have to change the name, just offering because I know these coyotes.
That's the route I'd go if they can't acquire Roy Williams.
If not for the wrist injury, I feel there's no way that a guy with his talent would otherwise be available at #28.
CosmicCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,027
- Reaction score
- 81
Off topic, if you ever want to change your username, PM me.
LOL....good one...
LOL....good one...
Deep_Freeze
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,225
- Reaction score
- 3,436
Keep in mind guys where we draft. We really need to pick a WR at #22 instead of #28 cause there are teams right after #22 that will be looking at WRs, while they won't be looking for RBs.
At #22 we will have more WRs to chose from, and I can only see a WR or CB at #22, unless one of the top 3 RBs fall. Otherwise it would be stupid to draft a RB at #22,
At #22 we will have more WRs to chose from, and I can only see a WR or CB at #22, unless one of the top 3 RBs fall. Otherwise it would be stupid to draft a RB at #22,
The Rawhide Kid
Gunslinger
- Messages
- 756
- Reaction score
- 10
:laugh1: Henson7's not as bad as "quincyyyyyy."BigDave95;2023924 said:
Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
I'd take a few WRs in the 1st
DeSean Jackson
James Hardy
Limas Sweed
Malcolm Kelly (if his knees aren't shot)
DeSean Jackson
James Hardy
Limas Sweed
Malcolm Kelly (if his knees aren't shot)
