Yeah. This defense isn't good enough to survive the gauntlet of the playoffs without a better pass rush.
The good news though? There's good reason to believe our pass rush improves.
Yeah, who knows? Through happenstance we could end up with a dominant pass rush in a couple of months.
Maybe marginally. I don't see why it would improve to the level where its no longer a weakness. Its going to take personnel changes in the off season for that.
No pass rush, no pass defense.
It is still as important as it always ways. If you do not get Manning, or Rodgers, or Luck off the spot where they are comfortable and disrupt their timing, this secondary is prone to being torched.
I'm all for the defense playing lights out and attacking like a pack of crazed dogs, but there are some truths about this game that have meaning.
Dallas can control the ball with the run.
They can keep their defense off the field as much as possible.
But this team hasn't seen a high powered offense yet. Not the likes of GB or Den.
The first test comes with Arizona. Palmer is 10-2 the last twelve games. He sits in the pocket, he has the skill set to find the open man.
Lawrence could be a difference maker. That is what they are banking on. Or frothing over.
We'll see. I hope he tears it up and gives this defense an edge rusher of note.
October 22nd... I'm not worrying about a Denver/Dallas matchup in February.
Between injuries and players possibly emerging between now can change things abruptly.
those hoping Spencer is going to do all that are really REACHING. The guy had ONE outstanding year in SIX when completely healthy.
Lawrence: we shall see but until he does it in a game all this frothing means diddly
DE is (as we've posted adnauseam) a problem but the other problem is at the #1 DT spot. Hayden is still on the field too much. He's 3rd in snaps at 238 and only has 4 QB hits and 1 pressure. McClain has 108 snaps and has 1 QB hit and 3 pressures... and that's with him coming back from a long layoff. I wouldn't be surprised that over the course of a full season of snaps, McClain would have 3X the number of sacks, QB hits and pressures that Hayden would.
Good observation. T. McClain was really energized against the Giants. I think he's just now getting close to 100% recovered from the injury.
The interesting thing that I've noticed about the DEs, especially Mincey is their style of pass rush. Many outside pass rushers run up-field on most snaps and are pushed past the QB on most snaps and then on occasion get a sack, but are often just out of the play when the OT pushes then wide of the QB. Mincey rarely if ever rushes up-field and wide. He's always going directly at the QB or rushing inside of the OT. He tends to get some amount of pressure when the wide, up-field rushers might be getting nothing, but he doesn't get a couple of sacks per game like many of those wide, up-field rushers.
I would compare Mincey to a CB that plays good but safe coverage and rarely gets INTs or a Safety that plays safe instead of going for the big hit.
Mincey's style also lends itself to better run defense.
I give Hayden credit for appearing to go all out on every snap, but the bottom line is that he's simply a very, very poor pass rusher.
In his career:
He's had 1932 snaps (about the equivalent of 2 full seasons). And he's produced:
3 sacks, 16 QB hits and 24 pressures.
It's bad at first glance and then when you compare him to a good pass rushing DT like...
Suh, who in 2013 played 913 snaps and had 5 sacks, 13 hits and 54 pressures...
Well that's telling us that all of the pass rush problems are not confined to the DE spot.
This season Hayden has played 238 snaps while the opposing offense has rushed the ball 161 times. Again, he's getting too many snaps.
I'm impressed by Mincey. He's exceeded my expectations. I could see him being a nice 25 snap per game guy off the bench.