Williams' Fumble on the Kickoff

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
I've never understood why they don't synch the replays so that you can see the position of the knee being down in one shot, and the strip of the ball in the other shot.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,021
Reaction score
76,728
To me that's another week of us having to overcome a scoring play by the opposing team. Maybe its the homer in me and maybe it was too close to overturn but there is now ay you can tell me that his knee wasn't down.
 

Tio

Armchair QB
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
339
It wouldn't be hard, just sync up all the broadcast camera's before the game. Makes a lot of sense.
 

Titleist

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,807
Reaction score
2,408
Knee was DOWN, no doubt about it. Garbage call by the refs
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,035
Reaction score
37,192
To me that's another week of us having to overcome a scoring play by the opposing team. Maybe its the homer in me and maybe it was too close to overturn but there is now ay you can tell me that his knee wasn't down.

Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.
 

Boyzmamacita

CowBabe Up!!!
Messages
29,047
Reaction score
64,100
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.

Unfortunately the initial ruling was clearly WRONG. Why the man in the booth couldn't see that is beyond me.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,035
Reaction score
37,192
stripped while piled on by 5 defenders isnt as big a deal to me as dez who keeps coughing up the ball for no reason

No, he's coughing it up for good reason ... he's not covering the ball with two hands or keeping it tight to his body in traffic. If you're going to try to cross the field with all those defenders nearby after catching a pass, you've got to cover up.
 

WPBCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,265
Reaction score
6,532
Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.

What was indisputable was his knee was down before any camera angles showed the ball coming out. They clearly decided to assume that the ball MAYBE COULDA been moving before the cameras picked it up. They went with might have been, rather than what was actually seen.
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,035
Reaction score
37,192
What was indisputable was his knee was down before any camera angles showed the ball coming out. They clearly decided to assume that the ball MAYBE COULDA been moving before the cameras picked it up. They went with might have been, rather than what was actually seen.

I'll have to take you guys' word for it until I get a chance to see it later. All I was relaying is what the Dallas Cowboys' announcers said, which was that they thought the knee was down but didn't think there was enough evidence that it was down before the ball was out to overturn the call.
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,260
Reaction score
18,651
Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.

They were right.

There wasn't an angle shown at the time that the ruling was made that definitively showed that he had possession of the ball in his right hand when his knee was down. My opinion, he was down, but the visual proof was not shown during that sequence.

If he had been ruled down, and the same thing happened, it never would have been overturned either.
 

percyhoward

Research Tool
Messages
17,062
Reaction score
21,861
They were right.

There wasn't an angle shown at the time that the ruling was made that definitively showed that he had possession of the ball in his right hand when his knee was down. My opinion, he was down, but the visual proof was not shown during that sequence.

If he had been ruled down, and the same thing happened, it never would have been overturned either.
That's what I'm saying. We had a clear shot of the strip and a clear shot of the knee down. They just didn't happen to be the same shot. They can synch the shots to the nearest thousandth of a second, so why don't they show both?
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,260
Reaction score
18,651
That's what I'm saying. We had a clear shot of the strip and a clear shot of the knee down. They just didn't happen to be the same shot. They can synch the shots to the nearest thousandth of a second, so why don't they show both?

Because two different tape ops are rolling the replays. Hard to sync roll with two individuals doing the EVS playback.
 
Top