percyhoward
Research Tool
- Messages
- 17,062
- Reaction score
- 21,861
I've never understood why they don't synch the replays so that you can see the position of the knee being down in one shot, and the strip of the ball in the other shot.
To me that's another week of us having to overcome a scoring play by the opposing team. Maybe its the homer in me and maybe it was too close to overturn but there is now ay you can tell me that his knee wasn't down.
Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.
We should worry less about the call and more about our player's inability to hold onto the ball.
stripped while piled on by 5 defenders isnt as big a deal to me as dez who keeps coughing up the ball for no reason
Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.
What was indisputable was his knee was down before any camera angles showed the ball coming out. They clearly decided to assume that the ball MAYBE COULDA been moving before the cameras picked it up. They went with might have been, rather than what was actually seen.
Didn't see it, but Sham and Laufenberg were talking about how the call could have went either way and it would be hard to overturn without indisputable evidence. If it was close, then the refs made the right call to stick with their initial ruling.
That's what I'm saying. We had a clear shot of the strip and a clear shot of the knee down. They just didn't happen to be the same shot. They can synch the shots to the nearest thousandth of a second, so why don't they show both?They were right.
There wasn't an angle shown at the time that the ruling was made that definitively showed that he had possession of the ball in his right hand when his knee was down. My opinion, he was down, but the visual proof was not shown during that sequence.
If he had been ruled down, and the same thing happened, it never would have been overturned either.
That's what I'm saying. We had a clear shot of the strip and a clear shot of the knee down. They just didn't happen to be the same shot. They can synch the shots to the nearest thousandth of a second, so why don't they show both?