With how poorly we played as a team last night do you really think any other QB wins that game last night?

cowboys5xsbs said:
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
Click to expand...
But none of the other problems get their hands on the ball as many times, nor are they looking for a contract which comes wuth a CAP hit in the $40m+ range.
 
QB's vs the 49ers so far:

Kenny Pickett: 31-46, 232 yds, 1 TD 2 INTs
Mathew Stafford: 34-55, 307 yards, 1 TD 2 INTs
Daniel Jones: 22-32, 137 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INTs
Joshua Dobbs: 22-41, 265 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs
Dak Prescott: 14-24, 153 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs

Wins the game? Not sure. Plays better and keeps the team in the game? Yea.
 
DallasEast said:
It depends. Could another quarterback have led an offense better than these possession results?
  • Punt (50 second drive)
  • Punt (less than two minute drive)
  • Fumble (running back | nine second drive)
  • Punt (90 second drive)
  • Touchdown (fifth possession | five and a half minute drive)
  • Punt (45 second drive)
  • Ran out of time (50 seconds | doesn't matter)
  • Field goal (Kicker is the most dependable player on the 2023 roster. The... kicker... | 3-minute drive)
  • Interception (79 seconds drive)
  • Interception (14 seconds drive)
  • Interception (69 seconds drive)
  • Punt (3 minutes and 55 seconds of futility drive)
  • Ran out of time (104 seconds of who cares?)
One thing is true if the answer is yes. The Dallas defense would not have been on the field 61% of the time, may have been more rested and effective, and San Francisco's offense would have been on the field fewer drives.

Would Dallas had still lost? Probably, but it would not have been 42-10.

Pathetic.
Click to expand...
To coin an over used cliche here and being genuine and not sarcastic...
This is a post of someone who understands football.
Totally agree.
Great job man.
 
cowboys5xsbs said:
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
Click to expand...
A better QB gives them a chance to win. The defense clearly sucked last night so if you don’t have a QB who can pick them up you get 42-10. When it was still a game they had Brandon Cooks being covered by Warner down the field. A good QB hits Cooks for a TD but instead Turdcott throws the ball in the sidelines. He can’t make consistent throws. You can’t be paying someone 40 million a year who is below average at what they do.
 
CowboyoWales said:
But none of the other problems get their hands on the ball as many times, nor are they looking for a contract which comes wuth a CAP hit in the $40m+ range.
Click to expand...
People who claim that the NFL will increase the cap forget that there are players whose contracts are coming due and need to be signed. Meanwhile you are spending the bulk of your cap on a QB who is really a backup
 
cowboys5xsbs said:
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
Click to expand...
It can be both a team loss and dak sucked.....dont you think.

This is another excuses thread.
 
erod said:
Nobody owes your blind butt any time.

Purdy was everything Dak never has been. It was obvious.
Click to expand...
If you took a person who never watched football in their life and showed them the performance of those two QB's - which one do you think would they pick as the guy making beaucoup bucks? Just be honest.
 
On the first drive, most QBs would not have thrown it over the head of their TE. When Brandin Cooks had his guy beat by 3 strides, literally 0 professional QBs would’ve thrown it out of bounds. Keeping the offense on the field would’ve kept the D fresh and believing.

Yes…yes I do think other QBs might have won that game, or at least kept their team in it. With Dak it was over the moment they scored 14
 
Mac_MaloneV1 said:
Show me the open WRs.

Also, totally asinine point if you're going to mention Romo, who threw junk balls every single game of his career lol
Click to expand...
Unless there was pass interference on every play, receivers are open. Do you mean "show me the receivers who were so WIDE OPEN that even Dak can make the throw"?

No, I can't show you those because we played a good defense. And the guy who eats up 25% of the cap couldn't make hard throws.
 
cowboys5xsbs said:
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
Click to expand...
No, he is not the scapgoat, he is why we can't beat Niners, With other QB, we can still lose but we may not lose like that. Hey Daniel Jonse's offense scored more points than Dak's
 
RS12 said:
He is a zealot. Dont waste your time. The ship sank last night. Only a few die hards havent figured it out yet.
Click to expand...
Lmao. A zealot.Did I say Dak played good? No.

You morons making broad generalizations about things that are "obvious" and not being able to cite one actual piece of evidence are the zealots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

  • Sarge
    Sarge
    Red, White and Brew...

Members online

... and 105 more.
Total: 4,268 (members: 205, guests: 4,063)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,689
Messages
13,826,407
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top