With how poorly we played as a team last night do you really think any other QB wins that game last night?

CowboyoWales

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,511
Reaction score
4,750
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
But none of the other problems get their hands on the ball as many times, nor are they looking for a contract which comes wuth a CAP hit in the $40m+ range.
 

John813

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,558
Reaction score
36,417
QB's vs the 49ers so far:

Kenny Pickett: 31-46, 232 yds, 1 TD 2 INTs
Mathew Stafford: 34-55, 307 yards, 1 TD 2 INTs
Daniel Jones: 22-32, 137 yards, 0 TDs, 1 INTs
Joshua Dobbs: 22-41, 265 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs
Dak Prescott: 14-24, 153 yards, 1 TD, 3 INTs

Wins the game? Not sure. Plays better and keeps the team in the game? Yea.
 

75boyz

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,666
Reaction score
10,499
It depends. Could another quarterback have led an offense better than these possession results?
  • Punt (50 second drive)
  • Punt (less than two minute drive)
  • Fumble (running back | nine second drive)
  • Punt (90 second drive)
  • Touchdown (fifth possession | five and a half minute drive)
  • Punt (45 second drive)
  • Ran out of time (50 seconds | doesn't matter)
  • Field goal (Kicker is the most dependable player on the 2023 roster. The... kicker... | 3-minute drive)
  • Interception (79 seconds drive)
  • Interception (14 seconds drive)
  • Interception (69 seconds drive)
  • Punt (3 minutes and 55 seconds of futility drive)
  • Ran out of time (104 seconds of who cares?)
One thing is true if the answer is yes. The Dallas defense would not have been on the field 61% of the time, may have been more rested and effective, and San Francisco's offense would have been on the field fewer drives.

Would Dallas had still lost? Probably, but it would not have been 42-10.

Pathetic.
To coin an over used cliche here and being genuine and not sarcastic...
This is a post of someone who understands football.
Totally agree.
Great job man.
 

JonesBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,858
Reaction score
5,530
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
A better QB gives them a chance to win. The defense clearly sucked last night so if you don’t have a QB who can pick them up you get 42-10. When it was still a game they had Brandon Cooks being covered by Warner down the field. A good QB hits Cooks for a TD but instead Turdcott throws the ball in the sidelines. He can’t make consistent throws. You can’t be paying someone 40 million a year who is below average at what they do.
 

rnr_honeybadger

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,856
Reaction score
18,176
But none of the other problems get their hands on the ball as many times, nor are they looking for a contract which comes wuth a CAP hit in the $40m+ range.
People who claim that the NFL will increase the cap forget that there are players whose contracts are coming due and need to be signed. Meanwhile you are spending the bulk of your cap on a QB who is really a backup
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,126
Reaction score
16,170
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
It can be both a team loss and dak sucked.....dont you think.

This is another excuses thread.
 

rnr_honeybadger

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,856
Reaction score
18,176
Nobody owes your blind butt any time.

Purdy was everything Dak never has been. It was obvious.
If you took a person who never watched football in their life and showed them the performance of those two QB's - which one do you think would they pick as the guy making beaucoup bucks? Just be honest.
 

McMicah

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
2,835
On the first drive, most QBs would not have thrown it over the head of their TE. When Brandin Cooks had his guy beat by 3 strides, literally 0 professional QBs would’ve thrown it out of bounds. Keeping the offense on the field would’ve kept the D fresh and believing.

Yes…yes I do think other QBs might have won that game, or at least kept their team in it. With Dak it was over the moment they scored 14
 

OGSixshooter

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,281
Reaction score
2,710
Show me the open WRs.

Also, totally asinine point if you're going to mention Romo, who threw junk balls every single game of his career lol
Unless there was pass interference on every play, receivers are open. Do you mean "show me the receivers who were so WIDE OPEN that even Dak can make the throw"?

No, I can't show you those because we played a good defense. And the guy who eats up 25% of the cap couldn't make hard throws.
 

leicafan

Active Member
Messages
182
Reaction score
198
Dak is just the scapegoat for those problems just like Romo was. Dak is the easiest person for everyone to blame and while he isn't good there a bigger issues with this team. There is plenty of blame to go around and it doesn't stop at number 4.
No, he is not the scapgoat, he is why we can't beat Niners, With other QB, we can still lose but we may not lose like that. Hey Daniel Jonse's offense scored more points than Dak's
 

Mac_MaloneV1

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,437
Reaction score
5,729
He is a zealot. Dont waste your time. The ship sank last night. Only a few die hards havent figured it out yet.
Lmao. A zealot.Did I say Dak played good? No.

You morons making broad generalizations about things that are "obvious" and not being able to cite one actual piece of evidence are the zealots.
 
Top