Worst songs of the 90s?

Boom

Boom

Just Dez It
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
691
Cotton Eyed Joe - Rednex
Blue - Eiffel 65
Barbie Girl - Aqua
 
Nova

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,701
Reaction score
12,659
Boom said:
Cotton Eyed Joe - Rednex
Blue - Eiffel 65
Barbie Girl - Aqua
Click to expand...

It's funny-- I know the Barbie Girl song, but I never really heard it all that much. Like I know it got a ton of air time, but I just escaped it somehow and never had that much hate for the song.


It is awfu,l though.
 
iceberg

iceberg

rock music matters
Messages
34,405
Reaction score
7,932
what music means to you is by and large how the industry tells you it is, (80s and 90s) or what it really is (60s and 70s). as digital distribution came into play and the RIAA couldn't stop it, the "path" to success changed.

dramatically.

i have my sweet spot, late 70s, early 80s. product of my birth and age to be sure. but i don't see any "new" music really being played, or even readily available. why? the path to success was smashed. the price to pay for the downloading wasn't just lost revenue, but a lost direction. we could no longer be told what was good and what wasn't. FM is dead. sirius isn't far behind. not because of technology, but content.

the current trend i'm seeing is that people revive an 80s radio station they loved and get all nostalgic and people "like" it on facebook so it sells. it gets likes. but what are they getting from said service they can't get anywhere else?

not a damn thing but we all tend to buy back our past.

music was a HEAVY influence on the 60s and 70s. the 80s is where it "popped" out and went corp. but what else could you do. you either did music that way or you didn't get a contract. a very close friend of mine turned down the contract poison wound up taking. it was a very very very messed up world at the time.

it still is now but for so many different reasons.

whether you grew up and somehow or another we're not our dads listening to slim whitman simply not able to understand "these kids today" or the music scene is just fragmented and lost, well, up to the person looking in.

in my day you built a nice stereo with 15" woofers and at least a mid and a tweeter (cerwin vega, anyone!) and appreciated the clarity and fidelity of music. today, hell, i'll listen over my phone or get some $20 headphones.

good music is worth more than that. but the stars have to realign. the way people "hear" new music, has to change.

i've been fighting this battle for 15+ years.
 
raybright

raybright

New Member
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
if music just was a product of age and birth, I'd be damned to stick with 90s music. I'm grateful it's not. Although I have a clear memory of a lot of euro dance music like Dr. Alban and Ace of Base.... Thanks to Grunge music I came out of the 90ies alive
 
BoysFan4ever

BoysFan4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,593
Reaction score
3,510
Way before my time but I love pretty much anything by the Beatles. That must have been a very cool era of music.
 
Nova

Nova

Ntegrase96
Messages
10,701
Reaction score
12,659
iceberg said:
what music means to you is by and large how the industry tells you it is, (80s and 90s) or what it really is (60s and 70s). as digital distribution came into play and the RIAA couldn't stop it, the "path" to success changed.

dramatically.

i have my sweet spot, late 70s, early 80s. product of my birth and age to be sure. but i don't see any "new" music really being played, or even readily available. why? the path to success was smashed. the price to pay for the downloading wasn't just lost revenue, but a lost direction. we could no longer be told what was good and what wasn't. FM is dead. sirius isn't far behind. not because of technology, but content.

the current trend i'm seeing is that people revive an 80s radio station they loved and get all nostalgic and people "like" it on facebook so it sells. it gets likes. but what are they getting from said service they can't get anywhere else?

not a damn thing but we all tend to buy back our past.

music was a HEAVY influence on the 60s and 70s. the 80s is where it "popped" out and went corp. but what else could you do. you either did music that way or you didn't get a contract. a very close friend of mine turned down the contract poison wound up taking. it was a very very very messed up world at the time.

it still is now but for so many different reasons.

whether you grew up and somehow or another we're not our dads listening to slim whitman simply not able to understand "these kids today" or the music scene is just fragmented and lost, well, up to the person looking in.

in my day you built a nice stereo with 15" woofers and at least a mid and a tweeter (cerwin vega, anyone!) and appreciated the clarity and fidelity of music. today, hell, i'll listen over my phone or get some $20 headphones.

good music is worth more than that. but the stars have to realign. the way people "hear" new music, has to change.

i've been fighting this battle for 15+ years.
Click to expand...

Interesting post.

What has happened to the music industry really isn't much different for other luxuries in a capitalist society.

1. Something great emerges, people like it.
2. Some professional entity researches said "great thing" and finds a way to appeal to a wider demographic.
3. Professional entity makes a ton of money, can dictate what is desirable and/or deliver said great thing at a price smaller entities cannot compete with.
4. Trends Emerge
5. Supply and demand weeds out a lot of the unique variants of the great thing.

More to it than that, but just a quick rundown.

The revolution or renaissance comes once the power is taken out of the hands of the professional entities by either the customer or the aid of some new vehicle that is difficult to regulate. For music, the internet has helped. Record labels cannot regulate the industry as much as they could in the past because people have the ability to listen to what they want at a much lower cost.

It seems like nowadays it's hard to know 'what's cool' because there is so much variety and a lot less regulations on the way you receive it.

There isn't much 'new music' because I think people have run out of ideas and there is a limit to what people are willing to tolerate-- can't just shout and bang two garbage can lids together for 4 1/2 minutes and expect people to like your "music". So with regard to that, Music is kind of like Movies or Fashion. Nothing is really 'new', just recycled and presented slightly differently.

Originality is an incredibly scarce resource in 2014.

But I think opportunity is much greater than before and therefore it's easier to find a band or artist that you like if you're looking.
 
BigStar

BigStar

Stop chasing
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
17,081
Hey Iceberg (respect for the in-depth post)

But one thing I didn't quite get is where you mention, "we could no longer be told what was good and what wasn't"... Wouldn't that be a positive? Or are you saying ALL music was being pushed out; watering down the standards of quality that were present beforehand?
 
Last edited:
big dog cowboy

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,936
Reaction score
112,997
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
In case anyone is interested, VH1 is showing their countdown of the top 100 songs of the 90's today. They are currently on #65 Didigal Underground with The Humpty Dance. My Lord!!!
 
FiveRings

FiveRings

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
247
I'll never understand the 90s image of bad music. In my opinion, it's one of the best next to the 60s and 70s. Some of my favorite bands come from the 90s, Dave Matthews Band, Pearl Jam, O.A.R and Umphrey's McGee, to name a few. Not to mention some of the best rap in its existence, with Biggie, 2pac, Dre, Snoop etc. If you're looking for bad music, turn to the 80s. With a few exceptions like Gensis, that music scene was a train wreck.
 
Seven

Seven

Messenger to the football Gods
Messages
19,301
Reaction score
9,892
iceberg said:
what music means to you is by and large how the industry tells you it is, (80s and 90s) or what it really is (60s and 70s). as digital distribution came into play and the RIAA couldn't stop it, the "path" to success changed.

dramatically.

i have my sweet spot, late 70s, early 80s. product of my birth and age to be sure. but i don't see any "new" music really being played, or even readily available. why? the path to success was smashed. the price to pay for the downloading wasn't just lost revenue, but a lost direction. we could no longer be told what was good and what wasn't. FM is dead. sirius isn't far behind. not because of technology, but content.

the current trend i'm seeing is that people revive an 80s radio station they loved and get all nostalgic and people "like" it on facebook so it sells. it gets likes. but what are they getting from said service they can't get anywhere else?

not a damn thing but we all tend to buy back our past.

music was a HEAVY influence on the 60s and 70s. the 80s is where it "popped" out and went corp. but what else could you do. you either did music that way or you didn't get a contract. a very close friend of mine turned down the contract poison wound up taking. it was a very very very messed up world at the time.

it still is now but for so many different reasons.

whether you grew up and somehow or another we're not our dads listening to slim whitman simply not able to understand "these kids today" or the music scene is just fragmented and lost, well, up to the person looking in.

in my day you built a nice stereo with 15" woofers and at least a mid and a tweeter (cerwin vega, anyone!) and appreciated the clarity and fidelity of music. today, hell, i'll listen over my phone or get some $20 headphones.

good music is worth more than that. but the stars have to realign. the way people "hear" new music, has to change.

i've been fighting this battle for 15+ years.
Click to expand...

Great post, ice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top