With Romo there was always hope. (I only remember one other like that - Staubach.)
so yeah, I think we'd be at least 4-1 because of the IT factor which happens to be an intangible.
This is the post of all posts of the Romo-Dak threads. No sarcasm.
I liked Romo because he was a razzle -dazzle QB. He made the game exciting. Yeah, he'd break my heart sometimes but he was something else.
Honestly, it took me awhile to get used to Dak. He's more close to the vest kind of QB, no razzle-dazzle more methodical and systematic. These two players are different and have qualities that make you root for or against them.
You might like the "IT" that Romo had or you may like the "IT" that Dak has. Whatever the "IT" you like can we stop with this comparison stuff?