Ranching
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,056
- Reaction score
- 107,334
He's already at that level.I would too. But I'm expecting at his ceiling, Dak will be more like Donovan McNabb.
He's already at that level.I would too. But I'm expecting at his ceiling, Dak will be more like Donovan McNabb.
Yes.are you saying McCarthy is a better coach than Parcells and runs rings around him?
Yes.
Now Parcells uses analytics, too.
He just uses it at the racetrack instead.
The Andy Reid coaching tree:i'm hoping McCarthy becomes even better than Andy Reid is using the run game to his advantage far more successfully.
it's often seems like an abandonment with Reid as it seems like its all placed on Pat Mahomes, ..and he's throwing 50 times, and taking a lot of pops and licks in the process,
and that's gonna be too much a toll on him come Baltimore-playoff time.
it does seem Reid is finally getting a much more competitive enough defense to better his Chiefs chances.
another thing to note is the Andy Reid coaching tree that will see assistants turn HC's - Matt Nagy, maybe eventually Eric Bienemy, etc.
Dunno if McCarthy has such a coaching tree.
ITS just incredible how insane some fans get calling a guy we just hired a fraud..lol.. I thought it was a joke at first, but found out they are serious.Yes.
Now Parcells uses analytics, too.
He just uses it at the racetrack instead.
Crazy, right?..lol...funny, these are the same fans when McCarthy won the super and took them many times to playoffs. Then he has a couple of avg seasons, and they want his head.
Offensive guru?
Aaron Rogers is an offensive guru, not BigMac.
So now we have to compare COACHING TREES to determine a coaches success?The Andy Reid coaching tree:
Brad Childress, John Harbaugh, Steve Spagnola, Leslie Frazier, Ron Rivera, Pat Shumer, Todd Bowles, Doug Pederson, Sean McDermott, Matt Nagy. 7 of the 10 have taken their team to the playoffs, two won the Super Bowl.
Mike McCarthy coaching tree:
Joe Philbin, Bob McAdoo, Jeff Jagodzinski (NCAA, Boston College for two years)
I want Mike McCarthy to turn out like Mike McCarthy. The man lead a perennial contender and won a SB. The Packers were always mentioned with the likes of NE, Sea and Pitt. McCarthy as much as anyone seemed to always have to compensate for a porous OL, crap D, no running game or a dozen guys on IR, but his guys were ready to play and he nearly always had his team in the tournament.
Landry has one more Lombardi than McCarthy, but the magic of the Cowboys during his time as HC was that they were always contenders. As a fan, that is all I ask. Keep my team in hunt and McCarthy certainly delivered that in GB.
MM had some very good playcalling initially and the Packers were unstoppable.Packers offense was better with Big Mac
Someone was curious so I put this up. I don't recall any part of my post where I said a coaches' success and his coaching tree are related.So now we have to compare COACHING TREES to determine a coaches success?
40 years ago maybe.
Landry and Lombardi would qualify as true, but Don Shula and others not?
Hmmmm..
Not even a top 10 QB this year. Yea, the year they have a great record are #2 seed. They are doing it with defense, the running game and no Ted Thompson.Offensive guru?
Aaron Rogers is an offensive guru, not BigMac.
It just infers it by including it in the post.Someone was curious so I put this up. I don't recall any part of my post where I said a coaches' success and his coaching tree are related.
Hasn't taken us to a NFC Championship yet. That's why I say he's headed in that direction.He's already at that level.
Owens took that Eagles team to the SB, not McNabb, but I get what you mean.Hasn't taken us to a NFC Championship yet. That's why I say he's headed in that direction.
Notice I said NFC Championships not the Super Bowl. McNabb took them to four.Owens took that Eagles team to the SB, not McNabb, but I get what you mean.
Ok you win.Notice I said NFC Championships not the Super Bowl. McNabb took them to four.
Ok you win.