Would You Be Hesitant to Work Under Teflon Red?

Idgit;4954094 said:
Yeah, I read that McMahon article, but didn't appreciate it as much, because it was dumb.

I don't love the fact that Jason hired his brothers, and I don't care if they move on via promotion or in whatever way one gets one's brother to move on with dignity.

I get not liking Garrett. I just don't see how anyone can consider the guy a scheming genius and say so with a straight face. I get the daywalker stuff, because he's a ginger and everybody knows gingers don't have souls (no offense, gingers). And I get the robot stuff because he talks and acts like a robot enough.

But the guy's just a smart guy who cares a lot about the theory of coaching and is working on the details of implementation. He's never been anything but an honest, stand-up guy that I've ever heard. And all his former teammates and former organizations seem to love him. Why choose to believe he's a secret weasel just because one wants him gone? It's just a weird take, all around.
Not really far fetched. There's a lack of Garrett-accountability while the rest of the village burns. In post-game press conferences where Garrett has made serious errors, he refuses to admit (at least openly) that he screwed the pooch. And now coaches are getting axed (deservedly so) while the Garrett clan (who has failed at ALL of their jobs as bad or worse than Ryan/Peete) remains entrenched in Valley Ranch. Grima Wormtongue wasn't that slimy. (shoutout to my nerds)
 
Idgit;4954094 said:
Yeah, I read that McMahon article, but didn't appreciate it as much, because it was dumb.

I don't love the fact that Jason hired his brothers, and I don't care if they move on via promotion or in whatever way one gets one's brother to move on with dignity.

I get not liking Garrett. I just don't see how anyone can consider the guy a scheming genius and say so with a straight face. I get the daywalker stuff, because he's a ginger and everybody knows gingers don't have souls (no offense, gingers). And I get the robot stuff because he talks and acts like a robot enough.

But the guy's just a smart guy who cares a lot about the theory of coaching and is working on the details of implementation. He's never been anything but an honest, stand-up guy that I've ever heard. And all his former teammates and former organizations seem to love him. Why choose to believe he's a secret weasel just because one wants him gone? It's just a weird take, all around.
Bob Stoops had both brothers with him for a while.

Mike Shanahan's OC is his son Kyle.

Lane Kiffin had his dad as his DC.

Bum Phillips hired his son Wade who hired his son Wes.

Jon and Jay Gruden have worked together.

Marty Schottenheimer hired his son.

Andy Reid had his son Garrett working for him.

Bill Parcells worked with his son-in-law.

Dan Reeves worked with his.

Tom Coughlin coaches his.



When I see people whining about those, I'll care that they whine about John Garrett.
 
stasheroo;4954109 said:
No, threw it out there because I've seen it rumored on both the radio and internet.



The specific source I heard it from was Todd Archer:

"Dave Wannstedt was Buffalo’s defensive coordinator last season. He was not helped by a turnover-prone offense and an ineffective Mario Williams. There are obvious ties to the Cowboys from his time with Jimmy Johnson in the early 1990s. He helped direct some top defenses in Miami as well that featured aggressive cornerback play."

Speculation was that Jerry Jones may go full 'Al Davis' and bring back both Norv Turner and Dave Wannstedt in a pathetic attempt to rekindle past glory.
But he's just tying him to the team's past not really saying it is a possibility right? I saw the name Dave Campo yesterday. I think you missed a chance to really go for hyperbole in responding to EB.

:wink2:
 
Hostile;4954113 said:
Bob Stoops had both brothers with him for a while.

Mike Shanahan's OC is his son Kyle.

Lane Kiffin had his dad as his DC.

Bum Phillips hired his son Wade who hired his son Wes.

Jon and Jay Gruden have worked together.

Marty Schottenheimer hired his son.

Andy Reid had his son Garrett working for him.

Bill Parcells worked with his son-in-law.

Dan Reeves worked with his.

Tom Coughlin coaches his.

When I see people whining about those, I'll care that they whine about John Garrett.

I'm of two minds on it, honestly. I don't love the appearance of nepotism, but I also understand the toll NFL coaching takes on a family and get why coaches would want to have family around. It doesn't look good, but it's only a problem when the subordinate coach in question isn't doing a good job and retains his job anyway. Or when it can be made to appear that way. I don't think that's necessarily the case in Dallas. And, I agree, people are just making up things to be upset about some more.
 
stasheroo;4954117 said:
That's fine if he attacks the source.

And who knows, maybe it (hopefully) won't true.

But if it is, I don't want any of these 'used car salesmen', on the payroll or not, trying to sell it to me.
Asking you where you are hearing it is attacking you? You're better than that. He and his ilk aren't, but you are.

I just want to know where, out of the clear blue you jump on a poster and throw that name out there like it is relevant. I don't see Wanny coming here, so maybe I am being myopic, but that was baiting.
 
Hostile;4954120 said:
But he's just tying him to the team's past not really saying it is a possibility right? I saw the name Dave Campo yesterday. I think you missed a chance to really go for hyperbole in responding to EB.

:wink2:

We'll see, won't we?
 
Idgit;4954123 said:
I'm of two minds on it, honestly. I don't love the appearance of nepotism, but I also understand the toll NFL coaching takes on a family and get why coaches would want to have family around. It doesn't look good, but it's only a problem when the subordinate coach in question isn't doing a good job and retains his job anyway. Or when it can be made to appear that way. I don't think that's necessarily the case in Dallas. And, I agree, people are just making up things to be upset about some more.
If you don't give a damn about it anywhere else, then you have no reason to give a damn about here. It is as simple as that. That's hypocrisy.

Actually it is just something new to whine about.
 
Hostile;4954131 said:
Asking you where you are hearing it is attacking you? You're better than that. He and his ilk aren't, but you are.

No, it referred to attacking the creibility of the source.

I just want to know where, out of the clear blue you jump on a poster and throw that name out there like it is relevant. I don't see Wanny coming here, so maybe I am being myopic, but that was baiting.

I 'jumped on a poster'?

Really?

Seemed to me that I was just giving back to someone 'scolding' anyone who didn't see things the same way they did.

Funny how that tactic only seems acceptable when it's in the name of pimping all things Cowboys?
 
superpunk;4954112 said:
Not really far fetched. There's a lack of Garrett-accountability while the rest of the village burns. In post-game press conferences where Garrett has made serious errors, he refuses to admit (at least openly) that he screwed the pooch. And now coaches are getting axed (deservedly so) while the Garrett clan (who has failed at ALL of their jobs as bad or worse than Ryan/Peete) remains entrenched in Valley Ranch. Grima Wormtongue wasn't that slimy. (shoutout to my nerds)

Grima was turned by Sauruman who was turned by Sauron himself. Garrett works directly for the Dark Lord. Totally different situations.

You probably think it'd take more than 4 Ringwraiths to beat a Balrog. Loser.
 
stasheroo;4954132 said:
We'll see, won't we?
Now see, if I said that to you, it would upset you.

Okay though. I have a feeling you won't see anything of the sort you just suggested.
 
Did Bob Stoops fire a poorly performing DC while keeping his similarly poor performing brothers around and in fact giving them promotions?

No?

Then maybe we should stop with the inane comparisons. I'll give a crap what Bob Stoops does when I'm a Sooners fan.
 
superpunk;4954112 said:
Not really far fetched. There's a lack of Garrett-accountability while the rest of the village burns. In post-game press conferences where Garrett has made serious errors, he refuses to admit (at least openly) that he screwed the pooch. And now coaches are getting axed (deservedly so) while the Garrett clan (who has failed at ALL of their jobs as bad or worse than Ryan/Peete) remains entrenched in Valley Ranch. Grima Wormtongue wasn't that slimy. (shoutout to my nerds)

Excellent post
 
Hostile;4954138 said:
If you don't give a damn about it anywhere else, then you have no reason to give a damn about here. It is as simple as that. That's hypocrisy.

Actually it is just something new to whine about.

Yeah.

"whining" - the ultimate descriptive term employed in a vain attempt to minimize anything someone doesn't want to hear.

Never been a fan of nepotism myself, not in sports, not in history.

Just because a relative is good as something, doesn't make another person good at it.
 
stasheroo;4954139 said:
No, it referred to attacking the creibility of the source.



I 'jumped on a poster'?

Really?

Seemed to me that I was just giving back to someone 'scolding' anyone who didn't see things the same way they did.

Funny how that tactic only seems acceptable when it's in the name of pimping all things Cowboys?
Isn't that the same thing? Or do we need semantics lessons so we're on the same page?
 
Idgit;4954143 said:
Grima was turned by Sauruman who was turned by Sauron himself. Garrett works directly for the Dark Lord. Totally different situations.

You probably think it'd take more than 4 Ringwraiths to beat a Balrog. Loser.

Also an excellent post
 
Hostile;4954150 said:
Now see, if I said that to you, it would upset you.

Okay though. I have a feeling you won't see anything of the sort you just suggested.

No I wouldn't.

We'll see how this defensive coordinator thing goes.

If it's a good hire, I'm sure many of us will be happy about it.

But if it's a retread that helps Jerry remain 'comfortable'?

Yeah, I'll rail against that.
 
stasheroo;4954155 said:
Yeah.

"whining" - the ultimate descriptive term employed in a vain attempt to minimize anything someone doesn't want to hear.

Never been a fan of nepotism myself, not in sports, not in history.

Just because a relative is good as something, doesn't make another person good at it.
Right up there with homer and happy fan and koolaid drinker.

Don't play the victim card. Let's discuss this.

So since you don't like nepotism would you point me towards a post where you've criticized the freaking Commanders for their obvious nepotism? Thanks in advance.
 
Hostile;4954157 said:
Isn't that the same thing? Or do we need semantics lessons so we're on the same page?


Oh it is.

When I see someone giving it, I'm often compelled to see them get it.

And feel free to treat me the same way when I'm doing that.

I usually don't initiate but I am guilty of reciprocating.
 
stasheroo;4954166 said:
No I wouldn't.

We'll see how this defensive coordinator thing goes.

If it's a good hire, I'm sure many of us will be happy about it.

But if it's a retread that helps Jerry remain 'comfortable'?

Yeah, I'll rail against that.
Mark my words here. No matter who it is, the up in arms guys are going to be upset about something. It's the same guys every time. Want me to go get the victory cigar links? I 100% guarantee you those most pissed at Rob smoking a cigar are pissed he was fired. It is about always being pissed at this team. It always has been, and I think you know that even though you are objective as a negative leaning poster.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,318
Messages
14,530,504
Members
24,209
Latest member
spartansde88
Back
Top