I agree, was wondering why no-one brings it up during any of Garrett or Stephen's press meetings.I always wonder why nobody puts it to Stephen this way..Its like very few interveIwers have the guts.
Power has been out here so I haven’t been active in the thread I started.
Talkin’ Cowboys argued in favor of trading for a DT today.
Once again Marinelli is not the one that keeps bringing in these types..Its stephen. HE owned it this draft..Marinelli is good about getting the best out of them, But Stephen is the problem coz thinks its not a good investment..What about Lee, Is he not worth keeping free so can flow to hammering the run game or keeping out of injury zone?.. Point the gun at the problem..
I agree, was wondering why no-one brings it up during any of Garrett or Stephen's press meetings.
Hey, your 2 starting DTs are out. Your very thin at the 1-tech position. What's the plan ? Why are you converting a promising 3-tech to a 1-tech.
Why are you guys so adverse to using resources on a talented DT. Does not talent equate to better protection for your Stud LBer ???
And so on and so on.
No-one ever does !
I don’t believe this is entirely true. I think Marinelli has blessed the idea that he can get by with the pieces they put out there.
I believe it’s been reported that Marinelli has been a big influence on how they approach the DT spot.
Have we tried Irving at 1 tech?
I mean playing him where we are thin. I am not overly smart when it comes to difference in 1 and 3 tech. I know the 1 is supposed to clog the middle correct?THAT is not the question as irving playing as a shaded nose..Correct? YOU may be referring to teams trapping Irving last year. THATS a Difference in technique of a nose or a one tech...
Lol. You would think. But probly no.I just went and watched talking cowboys. It does make me feel a bit better that they all see DT as a problem right now. If they see it, surely the coaches must see it - right ?