superonyx
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,425
- Reaction score
- 15,747
I’m not biased at all. Zero bias. I’m routing for laundry so anyone we get I’m a fan of as long as they are helping us.I know some of y’all are laughing because of who made this thread but if you put the bias aside and look at the numbers it may make some sense.
Let’s say Teddy at 20-23mil doesn’t quite get up to Daks numbers but is serviceable, but able to use the rest of that money to beef up the rest of the team.
OR
Pay 35mil and practically keep the same team and actually losing some players with Dak keeping his level of play from last year.
It is something to consider and I’ll probably get flamed but it does make a little sense if put your bias away.
I wouldn’t want Teddy even for $5 million if it meant we lose Dak.
Teddy is a guy you pick up either as a backup or a serviceable vet while you groom your franchise QB. Why would I wish for this? Teddy is Chase Daniel, Keenum, Alex Smith...guys who won’t hurt you but won’t lead you.
These scenarios are weird because the men being paid millions who have made riches evaluating football players for most of their lives all agree that Dak is a QB with the money.
a bunch of message board trolls and drama babies that don’t know as much as they think can cry all day.....but Dak is the cowboys QB no matter what they say.