Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,835
- Reaction score
- 103,565
dbair1967 said:what numbers are you looking at for this non-sense? Harper played 4yrs here, caught 124 passes for 2486yds (avg of 20.0yds per catch) and scored 18tds...that means his AVERAGE season was 31 receptions for 621yds, 20.0yds per catch and 4.5tds...his numbers got better every year in Dallas...his 4yr yds per catch totals dwarfed Jones'...16.3, 16.1, 21.6 & 24.9...then he added 24 more catches for 655yds (27.3avg) and 4 more tds in te postseason...if both guys avg the same amount of catches, but one guys averages a good 7 yds per catch or so more, gee I dunno, who's better Stash?
Obviously you 'don't know', The fact is you're trying to perpetrate a fraud here and anybody who looks can see it.
Jones has played three years, you can't compare Harper's 4 years to Jones' three just because it would help make your case.
And that's not even factoring in the fact that Harper was a receiver upon arrival and that Jones is still learning the position.
Look at each players first 3 years in the league, that's the only fair and honest comparison. Then come back and tell me who had more catches and more touchdowns. I know Harper had more yardage, but last time I checked you won for scoring more touchdowns.
dbair1967 said:and he'd be one of those mistakes, but Wilford and Reggie Williams have both been better than Jones
Going into last season, where he was benched and deactivated, Jones' numbers were as good or better than those two. Who was it again who led the team in receiving for 2006?
dbair1967 said:see above...I guess you've said this so much now that you really believe its true, when clearly it isnt...nor if you watched the two play together would anyone with half a brain draw the same conclusion
Facts are facts pal, no matter how badly you'd like it to be otherwise. Anyone with a pair of eyes can go to NFL.com and pull up the numbers for themselves.
dbair1967 said:who ever said he earned it? He did his job so well though that he earned a 4yr, multi million dollar extension didnt he? Highly doubt Matt Jones is ever seeing a 4yr contract extension at any point during his dismal career, and unlike Jones who almost assuredly will be dumped by his team, Crayton clearly wont be here and is an integral part of the offense whether he starts as the #2 guy or ends up as the #3 guy
Jones panicked and signed Crayton because he had nobody else. I would have done the same. Crayton had a good season, but the fact is that he was fortunate to luck into a starting role, not that he earned it.
You can again 'speculate' whatever you want about Matt Jones, doesn't make it true. The same as anything else you've posted. It's all your opinion.
dbair1967 said:Moss= talent, Matt Jones= no talent
Keep telling yourself that, maybe some day you'll believe it. Few others do.
dbair1967 said:sure will...but even if he does end up somewhere, I'll stick by my guns and say he'll never be productive nor will he ever earn a starting job...he just doesnt have the skill set for the position, nor does he work hard
And despite that 'perception, even 'dogging it', Jones has put up good numbers.....