Future
Intramural Legend
- Messages
- 27,566
- Reaction score
- 14,714
Great post...agree totally with almost all of it. Especially the Rice comparison. I was going to post the same thing.Cowboys22;3268513 said:Emmitt did have one trait important to RBs that you could argue he was the best ever at and that is vision. He also was as good or better than any RB ever at staying healthy and keeping his body in shape and ready for battle.
I don't really get upset to hear someone say he wasn't the best RB ever because there are good arguements for 3-4 other guys but my main arguement for him being considered the best ever is simply that Jerry Rice is almost unanimously considered the best WR of all time. Jerry Rice and Emmitt Smith are the same exact player just at different positions. They hold basically the same exact records for their respective positions and every single knock on Emmitt can be said about Rice. Emmitt wasn't the fastest but neither was Rice. Emmitt had a huge OL but Rice had Montana and Young. If Rice is the best WR of all time, then Emmitt is the best RB of all time. I think what hurts Emmitt is that there are more historical RBs that stick out as great players than there are WRs.
But, Barry Sanders had UNREAL vision. I know he made his living with quick feet, but for one thing you have to be able to see where those cuts can be made and where defenders are coming from. And he set up his blockers better than anybody by far. I will never forget a run he had against GB on Thanksgiving one year. He was inside the 15 or 10 and looked like he was in a footrace to the corner of the endzone with a defender. Instead of trying to beat him with speed, he stopped, let a WR block that defender, cut inside of another defender, and scored easily. That's a move that nobody makes.
Love the second