There are many times someone will make a FACTUAL post about Romo and people here will go off on them. It bothers me zero, but for example I made a thread yesterday that simply stated "Romo 2015 stats" with his stats listed and a lot of people went off on me.
I don't know why posting something factual with the purposes of debating it is considered wrong in any way. We are just fans and all of us have different opinions. I don't think Romo has accomplished anything of significance other than underachieving with a stacked deck his whole career.
Just my thoughts, I wish nothing bad on Romo, just don't think he is an NFL quality QB.
I don't know what the debate is about ... but Romo won't last 3 plays.
lmao. That's taking it a tad too far.. (& trust me.. if I am telling you that it's true).There are many times someone will make a FACTUAL post about Romo and people here will go off on them. It bothers me zero, but for example I made a thread yesterday that simply stated "Romo 2015 stats" with his stats listed and a lot of people went off on me.
I don't know why posting something factual with the purposes of debating it is considered wrong in any way. We are just fans and all of us have different opinions. I don't think Romo has accomplished anything of significance other than underachieving with a stacked deck his whole career.
Just my thoughts, I wish nothing bad on Romo, just don't think he is an NFL quality QB.
There are many times someone will make a FACTUAL post about Romo and people here will go off on them. It bothers me zero, but for example I made a thread yesterday that simply stated "Romo 2015 stats" with his stats listed and a lot of people went off on me.
I don't know why posting something factual with the purposes of debating it is considered wrong in any way. We are just fans and all of us have different opinions. I don't think Romo has accomplished anything of significance other than underachieving with a stacked deck his whole career.
Just my thoughts, I wish nothing bad on Romo, just don't think he is an NFL quality QB.
I suppose you believe that our bottom feeder defense in recent years has led the Cowboys to most of their wins? LOLThere are many times someone will make a FACTUAL post about Romo and people here will go off on them. It bothers me zero, but for example I made a thread yesterday that simply stated "Romo 2015 stats" with his stats listed and a lot of people went off on me.
I don't know why posting something factual with the purposes of debating it is considered wrong in any way. We are just fans and all of us have different opinions. I don't think Romo has accomplished anything of significance other than underachieving with a stacked deck his whole career.
Just my thoughts, I wish nothing bad on Romo, just don't think he is an NFL quality QB.
You can want Dak to keep the job AND respect and appreciate the career of Tony Romo.
It's disgusting to see so much of the fanbase turn on Romo for the shiny new toy. I know most of the fanbase is appreciative, but there's a loud and growing minority that's adopting the national, ESPN, TMZ narative on Romo to justify their stance on the current QB situation. Can we stop with that?
Why won't he?
Romo doesnt get any credit within the cowboys circles.
I have had espn on in the background all day, every show has had something negative to say about Romo everyone. Same with that awful fs1 station. All day long on local radio they use non factual statements to bag on Romo.
I was just listening to Steve Dennis on espn 103.3 while cleaning up after dinner. He just said Romo shouldn't play and that in 14 Romo only made 4 or 5 big plays and the rest was all murray. He was serious. Then he also said Romo is not a Leader and only appeared to be one because his back was hurt in 14 and he couldn't move at all and make big plays. What does that even mean? Insane.
don't even get me started on the cowboys postgame show which is just gbag nation on 105.3 the fan trying to figure out how to get out of romo's money and get rid of him 5 minutes into the postgame after a big win?
the local media has been awful to Romo and have led the way in misconceptions and false narratives which turned into national stories.
meanwhile, Phillip Rivers does nothing but lose in SD and he is not mentioned at all and when they do bring up SD its real quick and they will have a blurb about the coach being fired.....Same for Matt stafford. Its nuts. Phillip Rivers should be under the gun more than anyone, his organization picked him in the top 10 and dumped drew brees for him....and he never wins.
anyway. I can't believe the crap I am hearing today about Romo, I can't believe what suckers tv viewers and radio listeners are and how gullible and naive people are about this stuff.
He's been posting that in every Romo/Dak thread on this forum. Don't know why he keeps insisting on 3 plays (maybe a favorite number?).
If it makes you feel any better, I've seen/heard Carolina fans say that Derek Anderson might run the offense better than Cam...and DA threw two picks yesterday, lol.
I don't know what the debate is about ... but Romo won't last 3 plays.
I think as long as people make ridiculous comments like "Romo is our only chance of winning now" and "Romo is a better QB than Dak now" both of which are flat out complete lies... Then you will continue having people point out the FACTS on Romo.
When certain folks admit the TRUTH that Dak is a much better QB overall than Romo ever was... I don't think we will see any more Romo fact posting on here. Fair enough?
What years do you blame Romo for not winning a ring and what did JJ do to give him those chances?
It's not about players' feelings. It's about being a fan base that appreciates that these are still people we're talking about and that they're working very hard to be as good as they can possibly be at things are are very, very hard to do at a high level. For guys who run 8.5 forties to sit back and anonymously mock a guy's 4.5 while a bunch of other 8.5s pile on because they can is just embarrassing on some level, don't you think?
Breaking a rib, puncturing a lung, and still winning a game earns respect from people who understand how hard those things are to do. It earns a label of 'chicken' or 'old man' from people who do not. Being in the former group, when I see the latter happening, I'm going to point out how little respect I have for those labels.
I'm sorry but hu?
3 plays was how long romo lasted in the seattle ps game.He's been posting that in every Romo/Dak thread on this forum. Don't know why he keeps insisting on 3 plays (maybe a favorite number?).