Tio said:According to dr. z, bailey was 76th in deep passes allowed, and something like 72 in deep passes for touchdowns.
There are 64 starting corners in the nfl.
I have my opinion of the bucs, you have yours. I think both the scheme and have a great front seven helped.
Sheldon Brown was dominating last season. But, I think lining up with a probowl ss, fs, and cb helped.
I don't think they're bad cbs, I just think Shaun SPrings is better.
Well, I'm basing it on the stats, didn't really care for the game as it was two afc teams. I watched bits here and there.like a dog said:That Dr. Z article about the dude who wrote the passing book was a very good read. It is true that Bailey didn't grade that well in the article, but even in the Cincinatti game where Johnson burned him deep twice, Bailey had a pick and made several nice plays on the ball. I really think that because it happened on Monday night the actual magnitude of what occured got blown way out of proportion.
Tio said:Kevin Williams led all DTs with 12 sacks last season. SHaun Rodgers is the anchor at 345 lbs. Seymour had 1 more sack than him, I will gladly take the run stuffing Rodgers provides.
And I'll take production and recent results over scheme excuses and past judgement. I think last season Rodgers was the best nt in the nfl, so I'm picking him.like a dog said:I'd take them any day.
Phoenix-Talon said:First off, correct me if I mistaken, but doesn't the Pro Bowl have two teams?
Unless you were only talking about your selections -- but even then, you're leaving out so many qualifiers.
Believe only Hos identified a true Pro owler from the Eagles -- and I know his feelings about the Eagles. Yet he was able to distinguish talent from bias and make a selection. I'm almost surprised that none of you are able to select any Pro Bowlers from the team(s) that went to the Superbowl!
I won;twaste any more effort on this because it's rediculous. Here's my two obvious choices ...
Eagles ...Terrell (wants more money) Owens
Eagles ...Donovan (Superbowl) McNabb
Cowbozoys ...Roy (leave the horseshoes at home) Williams
I almost selected Owens over Harrison, but ultimately I wanted a possession WR opposite a home run hitter and Harrison is that, plus the chemistry with Manning.Phoenix-Talon said:First off, correct me if I mistaken, but doesn't the Pro Bowl have two teams?
Unless you were only talking about your selections -- but even then, you're leaving out so many qualifiers.
Believe only Hos identified a true Pro owler from the Eagles -- and I know his feelings about the Eagles. Yet he was able to distinguish talent from bias and make a selection. I'm almost surprised that none of you are able to select any Pro Bowlers from the team(s) that went to the Superbowl!
I won;twaste any more effort on this because it's rediculous. Here's my two obvious choices ...
Eagles ...Terrell (wants more money) Owens
Eagles ...Donovan (Superbowl) McNabb
Cowbozoys ...Roy (leave the horseshoes at home) Williams
Hostile said:QB Peyton Manning (Colts)
HB LaDanian Tomlinson (Chargers)
FB Lorenzo Neal (Chargers)
WR Randy Moss (Raiders)
WR Marvin Harrison (Colts)
TE Tony Gonzalez (Chiefs)
LT Jonathon Ogden (Ravens)
LG Will Shields (Chiefs)
C Matt Birk (Vikings)
RG Alan Faneca (Steelers)
RT Walter Jones (Seahawks)
3rd WR Torry Holt (Rams)
DE Julius Peppers (Panthers)
DT Kris Jenkins (Panthers)
DT Casey Hampton (Steelers)
DE Dwight Freeney (Colts)
OLB Takeo Spikes (Bills)
MLB Ray Lewis (Ravens)
OLB Keith Bullock (Titans)
CB Patrick Surtain (Chiefs)
FS Ed Reed (Ravens)
SS Brian Dawkins (Eagles)
CB Chris McAlister ( Ravens)
When switching to the 3-4 Hampton moves to NT and Donnie Edwards (Chargers) comes in in at ILB.
like a dog said:I almost picked Culpepper. Dr. Z, who I think is as good an analyst as there is, says that he think Culpepper is the most talented versatile QB in the NFL. It is just hard to ignore what Manning has done and how he keeps getting better every year.
like a dog said:Muitalo? He certainly fits the mold of a road grader at guard but struggles in pass protection. Hardly All-Pro material. I'd look at Toniu Fonoti from San Diego if you want a pure road grader. Not only is he a better masher, but he is a far superior all-around player.
like a dog said:Your defensive line is great except for Fergueson. He is not at that level IMO. There are a lot of guys such as Stroud, Henderson, and Rogers who are better. If you slipped Seymour inside and added Freeny (how do you not include the most devastating pass rusher in the NFL?) you would have a powerful line.
like a dog said:Brooks is a good pick. A few years ago he would have been a hands down, slam dunk pick, but I think Bullucks has passed him. Another guy to consider at WLB is Donnie Edwards. He plays inside in San Diego's 3-4 now, but he is a monster against the run and, especially, in coverage.
Urlacher? Bleh. Give me Lewis, or Al Wilson or Farrior or even Trotter or Jonathan Vilma.
like a dog said:Your right, Terrance Newman is a homer pick. He has as much natural talent as anybody in the NFL, but has yet to put it together. Lots of guys are better
Phoenix-Talon said:First off, correct me if I mistaken, but doesn't the Pro Bowl have two teams?
Unless you were only talking about your selections -- but even then, you're leaving out so many qualifiers.
Believe only Hos identified a true Pro owler from the Eagles -- and I know his feelings about the Eagles. Yet he was able to distinguish talent from bias and make a selection. I'm almost surprised that none of you are able to select any Pro Bowlers from the team(s) that went to the Superbowl!
I won;twaste any more effort on this because it's rediculous. Here's my two obvious choices ...
Eagles ...Terrell (wants more money) Owens
Eagles ...Donovan (Superbowl) McNabb
Cowbozoys ...Roy (leave the horseshoes at home) Williams
I love FBs who can open holes. I miss Moose. Neal is the best at that. I have never been all that big on the versatile guys at FB. Just give me the sledgehammer to open the hole. It is why I liked Jamar Martin so much and why I want Lousaka Polite to win the job here.like a dog said:Neal is an interesting pick. A little bit one dimensional as a blocker, but he can sure lower the boom. If I had a fullback I would go for Tony Richardson, nearly as good as a blocker and a much more versatile player.
Harrison is a good pick. Nobody is smoother in and out of his breaks. Calling him a posession receiver is a misonomer though. The guy can get deep.
Jones is a poor fit at RT. I believe that you did identify the two best tackles in the game, but Jones' game is more about finesse, making him ill-suited to the right side. Ogden would probably be a better choice to slide over with his physicality.
Jenkins and Hampton are both coming off serious injuries. Jenkins also has issues with his weight and alcoholism. I think you can do a lot better then either of them at DT (Seymour, Stroud, Williams, Henderson, etc.).
Spikes is a superb player, but I don't know how you keep Brooking off an All-Pro team. He is the most complete outside linebacker in the game.
Your secondary looks great. Dawkins would be a force at SS.
like a dog said:Read the subject line. All-Pro. One team, both leagues, best of the best. You are the only moron who didn't realize that simple, basic premiss of this entire thread.
Think about it before you start flaming people.
Phoenix-Talon said:You're touchy "lad!" I wasn't flamming -- just expressing the fact that the thread could be read from a different perspective. All-Pro does not mean "the best of the best from the NFL. There's No such distinction unless it's broken dwon by stats or from the two-teams AFL/NFL concept. So don't personalize this by calling me a moron -- didn't call you out of your name -- why would I? Wouldn't ...even if I felt you were wrong about something. This isn't the
Wasn't a lot of players mentioned from the Patriots either.
like a dog said:Well you are obviously a Commanders fan. Chris Cooley on an All Pro team!? What about Kleinsasser and Richardson and Pass and Griffith? They are all better.
Your offensive line would look like this:
LT - Willie Roaf (Still very good but not in the class of a Ogden or a Jones.)
LG - Brian Waters (One of the best young guards in the league. Interesting pick.)
C - Mawae
RG - Faneca
RT - Jordan Black (An unproven player with four starts in his carrer. Promising, but not an All-Pro.)
You could do a lot better then that.
Griffin had a good season last year. But he is certainly not an All-Pro, not even close. There are a lot of players better then him (Seymour, Stroud, Williams, Henderson, etc.). Jenkins would have been a good choice a year ago, but coming off a serious injury and with reported weight and alcohol issues he is a questionable pick.
Marcus Washington at SLB is actually your best Commander pick. He was fantastic last season. But he is not as good as Keith Brooking or as Takeo Spikes, Joey Porter, or Matt Vrabel for that matter.
Springs is not a top flight corner anymore. Clements is an intersting pick and should be good for a long time. But there are better (Bailey, Brown, Barber, Kelly).
Sean Taylor is an absurd pick. Roy Williams, Brian Dawkins, Michael Lewis, Troy Polamalu, and Rodney Harrison are all better, more proven players.
Tom Tupa is another absurd pick. What about Chris Hanson or Todd Sauerbrun? Tupa is not even in the top third of the punters in the league anymore!
What's wrong with analyzing all the teams? It's a good way to keep active in a thread.Mr. S said:dude, not to be offensive, but why are you analyzing everyones team list? If you have something constructive to say, that is one thing, but you are bashing certain picks even though there is some method to it.
For someone who is not in the top third of punters, he was the pro bowl alternate for the NFC.
Sean Taylor was in the running for DROY, and if his performance was based on the last 8 games of the season, he may have made the pro-bowl instead of being first alternate. Springs was better than most CBs in the league. Griffin also was well overlooked, and in my opinion, he definitely was dominant.
My o-line, I dont really know too many of the dominant people on the lines, but the Cheifs line, they do very well. It is all about production, and you can use the Commanders for a case in point, lots of talent on paper in the past, nothing accomplished.